Cubot X90 vs Ulefone Armor 11T 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Ruggedness
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Cubot X90 emerges as the stronger choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a performance edge over the Ulefone Armor 11T 5G’s Dimensity 800, despite the latter’s 7nm fabrication. The X90’s 33W charging also significantly outperforms the Armor 11T 5G’s slower 18W wired and 10W wireless options.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot X90 | Ulefone Armor 11T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2021, May 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74 x 9.4 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.37 in) | 163.8 x 81.6 x 14.2 mm (6.45 x 3.21 x 0.56 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 293 g (10.34 oz) |
| - | IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~68.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | 100 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 16 MP, 117˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired 10W wireless |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Black | Black |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 590 EUR |
Cubot X90
- More efficient and potentially faster Helio G99 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W wired charging
- Likely more modern software features
- Lacks ruggedized design
- No wireless charging
Ulefone Armor 11T 5G
- Rugged and durable construction
- 5G connectivity
- Wireless charging support
- Older and less efficient Dimensity 800 chipset
- Slower 18W wired and 10W wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the X90’s focus on modern features, it’s reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel than the Armor 11T 5G, which is geared towards practicality. The Armor 11T 5G’s ruggedized design likely necessitates a thicker glass cover, potentially impacting clarity and touch sensitivity compared to the X90.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the Armor 11T 5G’s rugged design may necessitate a simpler camera module. The X90, targeting a broader market, might prioritize camera features. Both devices likely include standard features like HDR and scene detection, but image quality will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cubot X90’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Ulefone Armor 11T 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm) with 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both use the same core architecture, the G99’s newer 6nm process generally translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance. The G99 also benefits from architectural improvements over the Dimensity 800. This means the X90 will likely handle demanding apps and multitasking more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Armor 11T 5G offers both 18W wired and 10W wireless charging, providing flexibility. However, the Cubot X90’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster, allowing for a quicker top-up. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the G99’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the X90, resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X90 if you prioritize raw performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value faster charging speeds. You'll benefit from a more responsive experience and less time tethered to a wall outlet. Buy the Ulefone Armor 11T 5G if you require a rugged, drop-proof device with 5G connectivity and wireless charging, and are willing to trade some processing power for enhanced durability.