Both the Cubot X50 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach this segment with vastly different internal hardware. The X50 relies on the older Mediatek Helio P60, while the Redmi Note 11R boasts the more modern and efficient Dimensity 700. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 700 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Cubot X50’s Helio P60, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience. While the X50 may offer a slightly lower price point, the performance gains of the Redmi Note 11R justify the potential cost difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.6 x 8.8 mm (6.57 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
16 MP, 125˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | microUSB, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | - | 22095RA98C |
| Price | - | About 160 EUR |
Cubot X50
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer a slightly longer battery life with conservative usage (depending on battery capacity)
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Redmi Note 11R
- Less efficient chipset leading to potential throttling
- Outdated architecture
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- Superior performance thanks to the Dimensity 700 chipset
- More efficient power consumption
- Faster 18W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the Cubot X50
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load (depending on battery capacity)
- Standard 60Hz display
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 11R’s positioning, it likely features an IPS LCD panel with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Cubot X50, being an older model, likely has similar display characteristics. The real differentiator will be color accuracy and peak brightness, which are unknown. Bezels are also likely comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility. The Redmi Note 11R, being a newer device, likely benefits from improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities within the Dimensity 700 chipset, leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. Sensor size is a critical factor, and without that data, it’s impossible to definitively say which phone captures better images. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would also be a significant advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the Cubot X50’s 12nm Mediatek Helio P60. The Dimensity 700 utilizes Cortex-A76 performance cores (2x2.2 GHz) compared to the Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 cores (4x2.0 GHz). This translates to approximately 30-40% faster single-core performance. Furthermore, the Dimensity 700’s more efficient process node results in better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Redmi Note 11R also benefits from a more modern CPU architecture with its Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (6x2.0 GHz) versus the Helio P60’s Cortex-A53 cores. This impacts power efficiency and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Redmi Note 11R’s 18W wired charging is a notable advantage. The Helio P60 in the Cubot X50 is less power-efficient, meaning it will likely drain the battery faster under similar usage. While a larger battery in the X50 could partially offset this, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11R provides a more convenient user experience, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X50 if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions like calls, texts, and light social media use. You’ll need to accept compromises in performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value a responsive user experience, enjoy mobile gaming, or anticipate needing a phone that can handle demanding applications. The 11R offers a significantly better long-term investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the Redmi Note 11R is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience compared to the Cubot X50’s Helio P60.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P60 and Dimensity 700 noticeable in everyday tasks?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. The Dimensity 700’s faster CPU cores and more efficient architecture result in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. The Helio P60 will likely exhibit lag and slowdowns when handling multiple apps or demanding tasks.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11R support fast charging protocols beyond 18W?
While the Redmi Note 11R supports 18W wired charging, it's likely compatible with Power Delivery (PD) protocols, allowing for faster charging with compatible chargers. However, the included charger is likely a standard 18W unit.
