The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Cubot X50 and Oppo A57s both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The X50 leans towards offering more processing power, while the A57s emphasizes convenience with its faster charging capabilities. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and multitasking, the Cubot X50 is the better choice thanks to its Helio P60 chipset and Cortex-A73 cores. However, the Oppo A57s wins for those who value quick top-ups, boasting 33W charging that reaches 100% in just 69 minutes – a significant advantage for busy users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.6 x 8.8 mm (6.57 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
16 MP, 125˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | microUSB, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2385 |
Cubot X50
- More powerful Helio P60 chipset for better performance
- Cortex-A73 cores offer superior multitasking capabilities
- Potentially better value for performance-focused users
- Likely slower charging speeds compared to the Oppo A57s
- Battery capacity is unknown
Oppo A57s
- 33W fast charging – 100% in 69 minutes
- Convenient for users who prioritize quick top-ups
- Helio G35 is power efficient
- Less powerful Helio G35 chipset compared to the X50
- Performance may struggle with demanding apps and games
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given their price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The user experience will likely hinge on factors like brightness and color calibration, which are not specified. Bezels are also likely to be substantial on both devices, typical for this segment. Without further data, it's reasonable to assume similar display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent for both devices, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the market segment, it’s safe to assume both phones will feature a primary camera alongside auxiliary lenses (likely a depth or macro sensor). Image quality will heavily depend on sensor size, aperture, and software processing. Without this information, it’s difficult to determine which device offers a better photographic experience. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a significant advantage, but is unlikely on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cubot X50’s Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60, built on a 12nm process, features a more sophisticated CPU configuration: four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz paired with four Cortex-A53 cores, also at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides a significant advantage in multi-core performance compared to the Oppo A57s’ Helio G35. The G35 utilizes four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. While the G35’s higher clock speed on the A53 cores might offer a slight boost in single-core tasks, the X50’s A73 cores deliver superior performance in more demanding applications and multitasking. This translates to smoother app switching and a more responsive user experience for the X50.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for the Cubot X50, but the Oppo A57s shines with its 33W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 69 minutes. This is a substantial advantage over slower charging solutions commonly found in this price range. While the X50 may have a larger battery capacity, the A57s’ faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering more convenience for users who need to quickly replenish their power.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X50 if you frequently use demanding apps, enjoy light gaming, or need a phone that can handle multiple tasks simultaneously. Its Helio P60 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the competition in this price bracket. Buy the Oppo A57s if you prioritize convenience and dislike waiting for your phone to charge. The 33W charging is a standout feature, making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Cubot X50 handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P60 in the Cubot X50 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The G35 in the Oppo A57s will struggle more with demanding titles, requiring lower settings and potentially experiencing frame drops.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While Oppo's 33W charging is fast, it's likely to use its proprietary VOOC or SuperVOOC protocol. This means you'll get the fastest charging speeds with the included charger. Standard USB-PD chargers may charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ How does the difference in CPU architecture (A73 vs A53) impact everyday tasks on the Cubot X50?
The Cortex-A73 cores in the Cubot X50 provide a noticeable improvement in responsiveness when switching between apps, browsing the web, and running multiple applications simultaneously. The A53 cores in both phones are efficient for basic tasks, but the A73 cores offer a significant performance boost for more demanding workloads.
