The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive. We pit the Motorola Moto G52, powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680, against the Cubot X50, featuring the older MediaTek Helio P60. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, helping you determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G52 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, provides superior performance and significantly better power efficiency compared to the Cubot X50’s 12nm Helio P60. The 30W charging is a bonus, making the G52 a more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.6 x 8.8 mm (6.57 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CA Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
16 MP, 125˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | - | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | - | About 470 EUR |
Cubot X50
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer a larger storage option at base configuration
- Simple, straightforward Android experience
- Older, less efficient Helio P60 chipset
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Inferior performance for gaming and multitasking
Motorola Moto G52
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset (6nm)
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Better overall performance and responsiveness
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially less storage at base configuration
- Motorola’s software skin may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Moto G52’s positioning, it likely features an IPS LCD panel with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Cubot X50 likely uses a similar panel. The key differentiator will be color accuracy and peak brightness, which are unknown. Without these specs, it's difficult to assess which offers a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 680’s integrated ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally provides superior image processing capabilities compared to the Helio P60’s. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Moto G52 likely benefits from more advanced computational photography features. The presence of a 30W charger on the Moto G52 suggests a more modern overall design and feature set, potentially extending to the camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G52’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller manufacturing process than the Cubot X50’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680’s Kryo 265 Gold cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a performance advantage over the Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz. More importantly, the 6nm process translates to significantly improved power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and longer battery life during sustained use. This is crucial for gaming and multitasking. The Snapdragon 680 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and ISP.
Battery Life
While the battery capacities aren’t specified, the Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process gives the Moto G52 a clear advantage in battery life. The more efficient chipset consumes less power for the same tasks, resulting in longer usage times. Furthermore, the Moto G52’s 30W wired charging is a significant benefit, allowing for much faster top-ups compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Cubot X50. A full charge on the Moto G52 is expected to be considerably quicker.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X50 if you prioritize absolute lowest price and are willing to compromise on performance and battery life. It may suffice for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value a smoother user experience, better app responsiveness, longer battery life, and faster charging – all for a still-affordable price point. It’s the better choice for anyone who uses their phone beyond the most essential functions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P60 in the Cubot X50 struggle with modern mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Helio P60 is likely to struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty, even at medium settings. The older architecture and 12nm process will result in lower frame rates and potential overheating. The Snapdragon 680 in the Moto G52 will provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680 make in terms of battery life compared to the 12nm Helio P60?
The 6nm process is a significant advantage. Expect the Moto G52 to offer noticeably longer battery life – potentially 20-30% more – for the same usage patterns. This translates to fewer charges per day and less anxiety about running out of power.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Moto G52 a substantial improvement over what the Cubot X50 likely offers?
Absolutely. 30W charging will significantly reduce charging times. The Moto G52 can likely go from 0-100% in around 60-90 minutes, while the Cubot X50 will likely take 2+ hours. This is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
