Cubot X30 vs. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance and 5G connectivity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly better processing power and efficiency than the Cubot X30’s Helio P60, justifying the price difference for most.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot X30 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 76.4 x 8.5 mm (6.19 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2310 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 101.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Penta | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black, Gradient Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | - | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Cubot X30
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset
- Inferior performance compared to the A52s 5G
- Likely lower-quality camera system
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price than the Cubot X30
- May be nearing end-of-life software support
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Cubot X30’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the A52s 5G’s superior brightness is a tangible advantage. The Cubot X30’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower-quality panel overall.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G likely holds an edge due to its more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the A52s 5G benefits from Samsung’s established camera software and processing algorithms. The Cubot X30, being a budget device, likely utilizes a less sophisticated camera system, resulting in lower image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS on the Cubot X30 further suggests a less refined camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cubot X30’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – versus the Helio P60’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G also provides superior power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s 5G will maintain higher performance for longer periods, particularly in gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency means the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieves this endurance with potentially a smaller battery capacity. The A52s 5G also supports 25W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the Cubot X30’s unspecified charging speed. This faster charging is a practical benefit for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X30 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize a responsive user experience, better camera capabilities, and future-proof 5G connectivity, even if it means spending a bit more.