The Oppo K3 and Cubot X20 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget and mid-range smartphone market. The K3, released with Qualcomm's Snapdragon 710, aimed for a balance of performance and features. The X20 Pro, leveraging MediaTek's Helio P60, focuses on delivering a functional experience at an even lower price point. This comparison dissects their core differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K3 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 710 chipset, built on a more efficient 10nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Cubot X20 Pro’s Helio P60, especially in sustained workloads. The 20W charging is a significant convenience factor, offsetting the slightly smaller potential battery capacity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2019, May. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 74.6 x 8.1 mm (6.19 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 161.2 x 76 x 9.4 mm (6.35 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 240 g (8.47 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 616 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.5", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.9", AF
8 MP, 125˚ (ultrawide)
20 MP, (depth), 1/2.78" | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), 1/3.06" | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3765 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gold, Black | Black, Nebula Purple, Morning White |
| Models | - | CPH1955, PCGM00 |
| Price | - | About 210 EUR |
Cubot X20 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- May offer larger storage options
- Less powerful processor
- Likely slower charging speeds
- Potentially lower camera quality
Oppo K3
- More powerful Snapdragon 710 chipset
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Likely better camera performance
- Potentially higher price
- May have a smaller battery capacity
- Could experience some thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K3’s positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and brightness. The absence of information on refresh rates suggests both are likely 60Hz. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of phones in this price bracket. The K3’s brand reputation suggests a more refined display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the Oppo K3 likely features a more sophisticated camera system. While both phones likely include multiple rear cameras, the K3’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Snapdragon 710’s ISP, are likely superior. The Cubot X20 Pro may rely on software enhancements to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone features optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K3’s Snapdragon 710 (10nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process than the Cubot X20 Pro’s Helio P60 (12nm). This translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 710’s Kryo 360 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Helio P60’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 710’s architecture is more optimized for demanding tasks. The 10nm process also means less heat generation, potentially reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Oppo K3’s 20W wired charging is a significant advantage. This allows for much faster charging times compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Cubot X20 Pro. While the X20 Pro might have a slightly larger battery capacity, the K3’s faster charging mitigates the impact of any capacity difference, providing more uptime in a shorter amount of time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X20 Pro if you prioritize absolute affordability and need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. It’s a viable option for users on a very tight budget. Buy the Oppo K3 if you value smoother performance for multitasking, gaming, and media consumption, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging. It’s ideal for users who want a more responsive and enjoyable daily experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P60 in the Cubot X20 Pro struggle with modern mobile games?
The Helio P60 is a capable processor for casual gaming, but it will likely struggle with graphically demanding titles at higher settings. Expect reduced frame rates and potential stuttering in games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile. The Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo K3 offers a significantly smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Oppo K3 compared to the Cubot X20 Pro?
Without knowing the charging wattage of the Cubot X20 Pro, it's difficult to give an exact number. However, 20W charging is considerably faster than the typical 10W or 15W charging found on budget smartphones. The Oppo K3 can likely charge from 0-100% in around 90-120 minutes, while the X20 Pro could take upwards of 2-3 hours.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 710 in the Oppo K3 prone to overheating?
The Snapdragon 710 is generally well-managed in terms of thermals. While it can get warm under sustained heavy load, it’s less prone to significant overheating and throttling compared to more powerful chipsets. The 10nm process contributes to better thermal efficiency.
