Cubot X100 vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Cubot X100 emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and exceptional 31:15h endurance outweigh the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s faster charging, especially for those who dislike frequent top-ups. However, the 19T is a strong contender for users needing a rugged device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot X100 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 78.1 x 8.9 mm (6.77 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Gold | Black |
| Price | $ 213.21 / € 199.95 | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 31:15h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot X100
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 7025
- Exceptional battery endurance (31:15h)
- Longer battery lifespan (1400 cycles)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks wireless charging
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Ultra-fast 66W wired charging (52% in 30 min)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Ruggedized design for durability
- Less powerful CPU (Helio G99)
- Likely shorter battery life compared to X100
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the price points, both devices likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here shifts to the internal hardware. The absence of high refresh rate or LTPO technology is expected, but the quality of color calibration and peak brightness will be key differentiators not covered by the provided data. We can assume both will target FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are missing, but given the market segment, we can anticipate both phones will feature multi-camera setups. The absence of information prevents a detailed analysis. However, the quality of image processing and sensor size will be crucial. We can expect the Ulefone to lean into its rugged branding with potentially enhanced outdoor photography modes. Without sensor details, it's impossible to determine which device will deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The Cubot X100’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) offers a clear architectural advantage over the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7025 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the G99’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both chipsets are built on a 6nm process, the A78 cores are more efficient and powerful. The X100 is better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. The G99 focuses on efficiency, but the X100's CPU architecture provides a performance edge.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 19T boasts a significant charging advantage with its 66W wired charging, capable of reaching 52% in just 30 minutes, alongside 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging. The Cubot X100’s 33W wired charging is considerably slower. However, the X100 compensates with exceptional battery endurance, rated at 31:15 hours. This suggests a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management. The 19T prioritizes quick top-ups, while the X100 focuses on minimizing the need to charge at all. The X100 also claims 1400 battery cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot X100 if you need exceptional battery life, a more powerful processor for demanding tasks, and value sustained performance over ultra-fast charging. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize a rugged, durable phone with incredibly fast 66W charging and wireless charging capabilities, and don't mind potentially slightly lower peak performance.