Cubot Tab KingKong vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Deep Dive into Rugged Android Tablets
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the KingKong’s MT8788, and the inclusion of 33W wired and wireless charging is a significant convenience. However, the KingKong remains a viable option for basic tasks and users on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot Tab KingKong | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 19 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 07 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 170.2 x 15.6 mm (9.89 x 6.70 x 0.61 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 820 g (1.81 lb) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~69.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, AF | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 10600 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Cubot Tab KingKong
- More affordable price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Acceptable battery life for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging speeds
- Limited camera information
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Higher display brightness for outdoor use
- Higher price tag
- Rugged design may add bulk
- Camera details are still limited
Display Comparison
Both tablets share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar image quality in terms of black levels. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts a measured peak brightness of 401 nits, which is crucial for outdoor visibility – a key requirement for rugged devices. While the KingKong’s display specifications are not provided, the Armor 13’s higher brightness gives it a clear advantage in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the KingKong’s panel type (IPS, TFT) makes a detailed comparison difficult, but the Armor 13’s brightness is a tangible benefit.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing. This suggests a focus on basic functionality rather than photographic excellence. Without further information, it’s difficult to assess the camera performance of either tablet. However, given the Armor 13’s overall positioning as a more premium device, it’s reasonable to assume a slightly more capable camera system, potentially with better low-light performance. The absence of details makes a definitive comparison impossible.
Performance
The Ulefone Power Armor 13’s MediaTek Helio G95 chipset represents a significant step up in performance compared to the Cubot Tab KingKong’s MT8788. The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores, while the MT8788 employs four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores. The A76 architecture is demonstrably more efficient and powerful than the A73, resulting in faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The G95 also benefits from a more modern GPU, enhancing gaming performance. While both chipsets are fabricated on a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G95 provide a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Both tablets share an endurance rating of 296 hours, indicating similar battery life under comparable usage scenarios. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13 offers a significantly more versatile charging solution. Its 33W wired charging is more than double the KingKong’s 18W, resulting in faster recharge times. Furthermore, the Armor 13 includes 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, adding convenience and the ability to charge other devices. While the KingKong’s battery life is comparable, the Armor 13’s charging capabilities provide a substantial usability advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Tab KingKong if you need a basic, affordable rugged tablet for light tasks like media consumption and simple productivity. It’s ideal for users who prioritize cost-effectiveness over raw power. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you require a more responsive experience for demanding applications, faster charging speeds, and the convenience of wireless charging. This tablet is geared towards professionals and enthusiasts who need a reliable and capable device in the field.