The sub-$200 tablet market is fiercely competitive, offering options for casual users, students, and families. The Cubot Tab 70 and Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022) represent two distinct approaches: a more open Android experience with a focus on longevity versus Amazon’s tightly integrated ecosystem. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which tablet delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Cubot Tab 70 emerges as the winner. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Fire HD 8’s Mediatek MT8169A, while its impressive 112-hour endurance significantly outlasts the Amazon offering.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | - |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 41 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 26 | 2022, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 257.6 x 169 x 8.1 mm (10.14 x 6.65 x 0.32 in) | 201.9 x 137.4 x 9.6 mm (7.95 x 5.41 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 555 g (1.22 lb) | 337 g (11.89 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~138 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.95 inches, 347.7 cm2 (~79.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~66.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Hexa-core (6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT8169A |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 2EE MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Fire OS 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, AF
2 MP (macro) | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | No |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, compass | Accelerometer |
| | - | Alexa natural language commands
Text-to-Speech English-language content reader |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Talk time | - | Up to 13 h |
| Type | 8200 mAh | - |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Black, Denim, Rose |
| Models | - | KFRAWI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 112:07h endurance, 1500 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class B (156 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot Tab 70
- Superior CPU performance with Cortex-A75 cores
- Exceptional battery life (112+ hours)
- Open Android OS for customization and app compatibility
- Slower 10W charging
- Display specs are unknown, potentially average
Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022)
- Faster 15W charging
- Tight integration with Amazon services
- Lower upfront cost
- Less powerful processor (all Cortex-A55 cores)
- Limited OS flexibility and app compatibility
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed specs like resolution and peak brightness are missing. The Fire HD 8’s display is likely optimized for Amazon’s content, while the Cubot Tab 70’s display will be more general-purpose. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting the budget nature of the devices. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Given the price point, both will feature basic camera setups. Detailed sensor information is unavailable, but it’s safe to assume image quality will be adequate for casual snapshots and video calls, but not much more. Focusing on camera specs would be a misdirection; these tablets are not designed for photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cubot Tab 70’s Unisoc Tiger T616, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with two high-performance Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and six efficiency-focused Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. This architecture provides a significant advantage in multi-tasking and demanding applications compared to the Amazon Fire HD 8’s Mediatek MT8169A, a hexa-core processor comprised entirely of Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, the A75 cores in the Cubot Tab 70 offer substantially higher single-core performance. The lack of LPDDR RAM specifications for both devices makes it difficult to assess memory bandwidth, but the chipset difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
The Cubot Tab 70 truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 112:07 hours of usage. This is likely due to a combination of the more efficient Unisoc chipset and optimized software. The Fire HD 8, with its 15W charging, offers faster charging speeds than the Cubot Tab 70’s 10W charging. However, the Cubot Tab 70’s significantly longer battery life and reported 1500 charge cycles suggest superior long-term battery health and reduced need for frequent charging. The faster charging of the Fire HD 8 is offset by the shorter overall runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Tab 70 if you need a versatile Android tablet for productivity, media consumption, and light gaming, and value long-term battery health. Its open OS allows for greater customization and app compatibility. Buy the Amazon Fire HD 8 (2022) if you are deeply invested in the Amazon ecosystem, primarily consume Amazon content (Prime Video, Kindle books), and prioritize a lower upfront cost over raw performance and OS flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Cubot Tab 70 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the T616 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact is a very demanding title. Expect to play at lower settings and potentially experience some frame drops. The Fire HD 8’s MT8169A would struggle even more with this game.
❓ Can I easily install Google Play Store on the Amazon Fire HD 8?
Installing the Google Play Store on a Fire tablet is possible, but requires sideloading and is not officially supported by Amazon. It can be a complex process and may not always be stable. The Cubot Tab 70 comes with Google Play Store pre-installed.
❓ How does the 1500 charge cycle claim of the Cubot Tab 70 affect long-term battery health?
The 1500 charge cycle claim suggests the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its capacity even after extensive use. This is a major advantage over tablets with lower-quality batteries, potentially extending the usable life of the Cubot Tab 70 by years.
