The tablet market offers a wide range of options, but finding the right balance between performance and battery life can be challenging. We pit the Cubot Tab 65, known for its exceptional battery endurance, against the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen), which leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680 chipset for a more efficient experience. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Cubot Tab 65 is the clear winner, boasting a remarkable 92:02h endurance. However, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with the Snapdragon 680 offers a more modern and efficient chipset, potentially providing a smoother overall experience for demanding tasks, especially in the LTE variant.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 241.4 x 160.2 x 8.3 mm (9.50 x 6.31 x 0.33 in) | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 530 g (1.17 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMCP/uMCP |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 20W wired |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Storm Grey, Frost Blue |
| Price | - | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:02h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot Tab 65
- Exceptional battery life (92:02h endurance)
- Potentially lower price point
- 1400 charge cycles suggest long-term battery health
- Older Unisoc T615 chipset may struggle with demanding tasks
- Display quality likely inferior to Lenovo
- Limited camera capabilities
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset (LTE model)
- Faster charging (20W)
- Potentially better display quality
- Shorter battery life compared to Cubot Tab 65
- Helio G80 variant (Wi-Fi) offers less performance advantage
- May be more expensive than Cubot Tab 65
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data. However, given the price points of both tablets, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus likely benefits from a slightly higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy, aligning with Lenovo’s focus on multimedia experiences. The Cubot Tab 65, while likely adequate, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Both tablets likely feature basic camera setups geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. Without specific sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Lenovo’s broader market presence, the Tab M10 Plus may benefit from slightly more refined image processing algorithms. We anticipate both tablets will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cubot Tab 65’s Unisoc T615 (12nm) utilizes a combination of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, offering a decent level of performance for everyday tasks. However, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) presents two options: the Snapdragon 680 (6nm) in the LTE model and the Helio G80 (12nm) in the Wi-Fi only version. The Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, is significantly more power-efficient than the Unisoc T615 and the Helio G80, translating to less heat and potentially sustained performance. The Snapdragon’s Kryo cores also offer a performance advantage over the Cortex-A75 in the Unisoc chip. The Wi-Fi only model with the Helio G80 will likely offer similar performance to the Cubot Tab 65, but with potentially less efficient power management.
Battery Life
The Cubot Tab 65 truly shines in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 92:02h of usage. This is a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus, which lacks specific endurance data but is likely to fall considerably short. While the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus supports 20W wired charging, potentially offering faster top-ups, the Cubot Tab 65’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Unisoc T615’s less efficient architecture is offset by a larger battery capacity (not specified, but implied by the endurance test) and optimized power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Tab 65 if you need a tablet that can truly last through multiple days of moderate use, making it ideal for travel, long commutes, or situations where access to power is limited. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you prioritize a more responsive user experience, particularly if you opt for the LTE model, and value the benefits of a newer chipset architecture for app compatibility and future updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T615 in the Cubot Tab 65 struggle with multitasking or demanding apps?
The Unisoc T615 is capable of handling everyday tasks like browsing, video streaming, and social media. However, it may exhibit slowdowns when running multiple demanding applications simultaneously or playing graphically intensive games. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with the Snapdragon 680 will offer a smoother experience in these scenarios.
❓ Is the 20W charging on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus a significant advantage over the Cubot Tab 65, considering the latter's longer battery life?
While 20W charging is faster than what the Cubot Tab 65 likely offers, the Cubot's exceptional battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The Lenovo's faster charging is more beneficial for users who frequently deplete their battery and require a quick boost, but the Cubot Tab 65's longevity reduces reliance on this feature.
❓ Which tablet is better for streaming video for extended periods?
The Cubot Tab 65 is the clear winner for extended video streaming due to its significantly longer battery life. You'll be able to watch movies and shows for hours on end without needing to worry about finding a power outlet.
❓ Does the LTE connectivity of the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) justify the price premium over the Wi-Fi only model and the Cubot Tab 65?
If you frequently travel or need internet access in areas without Wi-Fi, the LTE connectivity is a valuable feature. However, if you primarily use your tablet at home or in locations with reliable Wi-Fi, the added cost may not be worthwhile. Consider your usage patterns carefully.
