The budget tablet market is heating up, with the Cubot Tab 65 and Blackview Tab 15 vying for attention. Both leverage Unisoc chipsets, but subtle differences in CPU configuration and features like charging speed could make one a significantly better choice depending on your priorities. This comparison dissects the key specs to determine which tablet delivers the most bang for your buck.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing longevity and sustained performance, the Cubot Tab 65 emerges as the winner. Its impressive 92:02h endurance rating, coupled with 1400 battery cycles, significantly surpasses the Blackview Tab 15, despite the latter's faster 18W charging. The Tab 65 is ideal for extended use cases like travel or digital reading.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2022, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2022, October 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 241.4 x 160.2 x 8.3 mm (9.50 x 6.31 x 0.33 in) | 246.4 x 161.5 x 7.3 mm (9.70 x 6.36 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 530 g (1.17 lb) | 525 g (1.16 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~216 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.5 inches, 319.7 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, Doke OS_P 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 13 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM Radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 6200 mAh | 8280 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Lunar Silver, Twilight Blue, Space Gray |
| Price | - | About 230 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:02h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot Tab 65
- Exceptional battery life (92:02h endurance)
- High battery cycle count (1400 cycles)
- Efficient Unisoc T615 chipset
- Charging speed not specified (likely slower than Blackview)
- Display specifications unknown
Blackview Tab 15
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially slightly faster multi-core performance
- Slightly faster Cortex-A55 cores
- No battery endurance data provided
- Likely shorter overall battery life
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the price point, both tablets likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The user experience will likely hinge on resolution and color calibration, areas where neither brand has a strong track record. Expect average viewing angles and color accuracy. Bezels are also likely to be substantial on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent from the provided data. Given the target market, expect basic camera setups on both tablets, likely focused on capturing casual snapshots. Image quality will likely be adequate in good lighting conditions but will struggle in low light. The absence of information prevents any meaningful comparison beyond stating that both will likely feature similar limitations.
Performance
Both the Cubot Tab 65 and Blackview Tab 15 are powered by Unisoc chipsets fabricated on a 12nm process. The Cubot Tab 65 utilizes the Unisoc T615, featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Blackview Tab 15 employs the Unisoc T610, also octa-core, but with 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores paired with 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The slightly faster Cortex-A55 cores in the Blackview Tab 15 *may* offer a marginal performance boost in multi-threaded tasks, but the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use. The T615's efficiency may provide a slight edge in sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Cubot Tab 65 boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 92:02h of usage time and supporting 1400 battery cycles. This suggests a larger battery capacity and optimized power management. The Blackview Tab 15, while offering 18W wired charging for faster top-ups, lacks any endurance data. The 18W charging will reduce downtime, but the Cubot Tab 65’s extended runtime minimizes the need for frequent charging, making it ideal for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Tab 65 if you need a tablet that can reliably last through long flights, extended reading sessions, or frequent travel without constantly searching for an outlet. Its exceptional battery endurance is its defining feature. Buy the Blackview Tab 15 if you prioritize quicker top-ups and don't mind potentially more frequent charging, and if the convenience of 18W charging outweighs the longer overall runtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How will the difference in Cortex-A55 core speed impact real-world performance?
The Blackview Tab 15's slightly faster 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores compared to the Cubot Tab 65's 1.6 GHz cores will likely result in a minimal performance difference in everyday tasks. The impact will be most noticeable in heavily multi-threaded applications, but the difference is unlikely to be significant enough to be perceived by most users.
❓ What does '1400 battery cycles' mean for the Cubot Tab 65's longevity?
A battery cycle is a complete discharge and recharge of the battery. The Cubot Tab 65's 1400 cycle rating indicates that the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its original capacity even after being fully charged and discharged 1400 times. This suggests a longer lifespan and reduced battery degradation compared to tablets with lower cycle counts.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Blackview Tab 15 a significant advantage?
While 18W charging is faster than standard charging speeds, the Cubot Tab 65’s exceptional battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The convenience of faster charging on the Blackview Tab 15 is beneficial, but it doesn't compensate for the significantly shorter overall runtime.
