The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, offering options for casual users and media consumers. We pit the Cubot Tab 65, a relatively new entrant focused on longevity, against the established Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021), known for its tight integration with the Amazon ecosystem. This comparison will dissect their core components to determine which tablet delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a more open Android experience, the Cubot Tab 65 is the better choice. Its impressive 92:02h endurance significantly surpasses what's expected from the Fire HD 10 Plus, despite the latter's wireless charging convenience. However, Amazon ecosystem users will find the Fire HD 10 Plus more convenient.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | - |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2021, April 27. Released 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 241.4 x 160.2 x 8.3 mm (9.50 x 6.31 x 0.33 in) | 247 x 166 x 9.2 mm (9.72 x 6.54 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 530 g (1.17 lb) | 468 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~149 ppi density) | 1920 x 1200 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT8183 Helio P60T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Fire OS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | No |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer |
| | - | Text-to-Speech English-language content reader |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless |
| Type | 6200 mAh | Li-Ion |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Slate |
| Models | - | T76N2P |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 92:02h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class E | - |
| Free fall | Class E (52 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot Tab 65
- Exceptional battery life (92:02h endurance)
- Long-lasting battery health (1400 cycles)
- Potentially cleaner Android experience
- More modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A75)
- Display specs are unknown
- Brand recognition is lower than Amazon
Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021)
- Wireless charging convenience
- Seamless Amazon ecosystem integration
- Established brand and support network
- Generally lower price point
- Fire OS limitations and bloatware
- Likely shorter battery life
- Older CPU architecture (Cortex-A73)
Display Comparison
Neither tablet boasts a cutting-edge display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar display controller capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing for the Cubot Tab 65, the Fire HD 10 Plus’s 10.1-inch IPS LCD is adequate for media consumption. The key differentiator here isn’t display quality, but the software experience; Fire OS heavily modifies the Android interface, while the Cubot Tab 65 likely offers a closer-to-stock Android experience. This impacts color accuracy and customization options.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are positioned as budget devices, and detailed camera specs are unavailable. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls, but not for serious photography. Focusing on the chipset’s ISP capabilities, the Unisoc T615 likely offers slightly improved image processing due to its newer architecture, but the difference will be marginal.
Performance
The chipset battle is intriguing. The Cubot Tab 65’s Unisoc T615 features a Cortex-A75 prime core, designed for sustained performance, paired with six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus’s MediaTek Helio P60T, which uses four Cortex-A73 cores and four Cortex-A53 cores. While the Helio P60T’s A73 cores have a slightly higher peak clock speed (2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz), the T615’s newer architecture and core configuration suggest better multi-core performance and efficiency. The T615’s 12nm process node is identical to the P60T, so thermal differences will likely be minimal, but the A75 cores should handle demanding tasks more gracefully.
Battery Life
This is where the Cubot Tab 65 truly shines. Its reported 92:02h endurance is exceptional for a tablet, and the 1400 charge cycles suggest long-term battery health. The Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus, while offering wireless charging – a convenience factor – doesn’t disclose endurance figures. The Fire HD 10 Plus’s battery capacity is likely smaller, and the overhead of Fire OS could further reduce runtime. The Cubot Tab 65’s endurance is a significant advantage for users who prioritize unplugged usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Tab 65 if you need a tablet that can reliably last through long flights, extended reading sessions, or as a dedicated media player without constant charging. It’s ideal for users who prefer a standard Android experience and want flexibility in app choices. Buy the Amazon Fire HD 10 Plus (2021) if you are heavily invested in the Amazon ecosystem – Prime Video, Kindle, Audible – and value the seamless integration and wireless charging, accepting the limitations of the Fire OS.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc T615 in the Cubot Tab 65 struggle with demanding games like PUBG?
While the Unisoc T615 isn't a flagship chipset, its Cortex-A75 cores provide a decent level of performance. PUBG should be playable at medium settings, but don't expect consistently high frame rates. The Fire HD 10 Plus’s Helio P60T will offer similar gaming performance, but may experience more thermal throttling during extended sessions.
❓ How much does the Amazon Fire OS limit app compatibility on the Fire HD 10 Plus?
Fire OS is based on Android, but lacks full Google Play Store support. You'll primarily rely on the Amazon Appstore, which has a smaller selection of apps. While many popular apps are available, some may be missing or outdated. Sideloading apps is possible, but requires technical knowledge and isn't officially supported.
❓ Is the wireless charging on the Fire HD 10 Plus a significant advantage?
Wireless charging is convenient, but it's slower than wired charging. The Cubot Tab 65’s exceptional battery life mitigates the need for frequent charging, reducing the importance of wireless charging. If you already have a wireless charging pad, it's a nice bonus, but not a deal-breaker.
