Cubot Tab 40 vs. Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen): Which Budget Tablet Reigns Supreme?

The budget tablet market is fiercely competitive, with options like the Cubot Tab 40 and Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) vying for attention. Both aim to deliver a functional Android experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The key differentiator lies in their chipsets: Unisoc’s Tiger T616 in the Cubot versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 680 (or Mediatek Helio G80 in the Wi-Fi model) in the Lenovo. This comparison will dissect these differences and determine which tablet offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with the Snapdragon 680 is the better choice. Its 6nm process node provides a clear advantage in thermal management and power consumption, translating to smoother multitasking and longer battery life compared to the Cubot Tab 40’s Unisoc T616.

PHONES
Phone Names Cubot Tab 40 Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 26, 28, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 390/75 Mbps - cellular model only
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, September 112022, May
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, September 18Available. Released 2022, May
Body
Dimensions247.3 x 157.1 x 7.7 mm (9.74 x 6.19 x 0.30 in)251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight449 g (15.84 oz)465 g (1.03 lb)
 -Stylus support
Display
Resolution1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~224 ppi density)1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density)
Size10.4 inches, 307.9 cm2 (~79.2% screen-to-body ratio)10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) - LTE model Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Wi-Fi only model
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) - LTE model Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) - Wi-Fi only model
GPUMali-G57 MP1Adreno 610 - LTE model Mali-G52 MC2 - Wi-Fi only model
OSAndroid 13Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 -eMCP/uMCP
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash-
Single13 MP, AF8 MP, AF
VideoYes1080p
Selfie camera
Single5 MP8 MP
VideoYes-
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)
Comms
Bluetooth5.05.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only
RadioUnspecifiedFM Radio
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, compassAccelerometer, proximity, gyro
Battery
Charging-20W wired
Type7000 mAhLi-Po 7700 mAh
Misc
ColorsGrayStorm Grey, Frost Blue
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 260 EUR

Cubot Tab 40

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Adequate for basic tasks
  • Unisoc T616 offers decent efficiency for light use

  • Inferior chipset performance compared to Snapdragon 680
  • Likely slower charging speeds
  • May struggle with multitasking and demanding apps

Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen)

  • Superior performance with Snapdragon 680 (or competitive with Helio G80)
  • More efficient 6nm process (Snapdragon variant)
  • Faster 20W charging

  • Slightly higher price
  • Helio G80 variant less efficient than Snapdragon 680
  • Camera performance likely similar to Cubot Tab 40

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Specifications are missing for both regarding brightness and color accuracy, but given their price points, we can expect IPS LCD panels with decent, but not exceptional, viewing angles. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) likely benefits from Lenovo’s display calibration expertise, potentially offering slightly more accurate colors. Bezels are expected to be similar on both, reflecting their budget positioning. The absence of high refresh rate panels is standard for this segment.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is unlikely to be a deciding factor for either tablet. Both are likely equipped with basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The focus should be on video calling and casual snapshots, not photography. Any claims of advanced features should be viewed with skepticism. The absence of OIS on both devices further limits their photographic capabilities.

Performance

The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) offers two variants: a Snapdragon 680 (6nm) and a Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 680, with its Kryo 265 Gold cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, provides a significant performance uplift over the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Cubot Tab 40. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon is crucial; it generates less heat and consumes less power for the same level of performance. While both CPUs feature a 2x Cortex-A75 and 6x Cortex-A55 configuration, the Snapdragon’s superior architecture and manufacturing process give it the edge. The Wi-Fi only model with the Helio G80 will perform similarly to the Cubot Tab 40, but still benefits from Qualcomm's GPU.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both will likely fall in the 5000-7000 mAh range. However, the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) benefits from the Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency. This translates to longer battery life during typical usage. Furthermore, the Lenovo supports 20W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Cubot Tab 40. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon is the key factor here, minimizing power draw during both active use and standby.

Buying Guide

Buy the Cubot Tab 40 if you need a tablet for very basic tasks like media consumption and light web browsing, and are on an extremely tight budget. Its Unisoc T616 is adequate for these scenarios. Buy the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and a more responsive user experience, especially if you opt for the 4G LTE model with the Snapdragon 680. The improved chipset and 20W charging justify the slightly higher price.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T616 in the Cubot Tab 40 struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
Yes, the Unisoc Tiger T616, while capable for basic tasks, is likely to exhibit slowdowns and lag when running several apps concurrently. Its lower processing power and less efficient architecture compared to the Snapdragon 680 mean it has less headroom for multitasking.
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio G80 version of the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) a significant downgrade compared to the Snapdragon 680 version?
The Helio G80 is a capable chipset, but it's less efficient than the Snapdragon 680 due to its 12nm process. You'll notice a difference in battery life and sustained performance, especially during gaming or demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 680 offers a smoother and more efficient experience.
❓ Can either of these tablets handle popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Both tablets can *run* these games, but the experience will be significantly better on the Lenovo Tab M10 Plus (3rd Gen) with the Snapdragon 680. Expect lower frame rates and more frequent stuttering on the Cubot Tab 40. The Helio G80 version of the Lenovo will offer a better gaming experience than the Cubot, but still won't match the Snapdragon.