Poco X5 Pro vs Cubot P80: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides significantly better performance, and the 67W charging is a game-changer. While the Cubot P80 offers a lower price point, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot P80 | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 75.8 x 9.8 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.39 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) 0.3 MP | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 24 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple, Pink, Light Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 160 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Cubot P80
- Significantly lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Outdated chipset and CPU architecture
- Inferior performance for gaming and multitasking
- Likely lower-quality display and camera
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Fast 67W charging with multiple protocols
- Bright and vibrant display
- Higher price compared to the Cubot P80
- May not be the absolute best in its price bracket (flagship killers exist)
- No expandable storage (likely)
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 912 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Cubot P80. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the Poco X5 Pro’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The Cubot P80’s display specifications are limited, suggesting a potentially lower-quality panel with less accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are sparse for the Cubot P80. The Poco X5 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G, offering better image processing and noise reduction. Without specific sensor details for the Cubot P80, it’s safe to assume the Poco X5 Pro will deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the P80 further suggests a less sophisticated camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cubot P80’s Mediatek MT8788V/WA. The Snapdragon 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – versus the P80’s older 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. This architectural advantage, combined with the 6nm process node, results in significantly better CPU and GPU performance on the Poco X5 Pro, and improved thermal efficiency. The P80 will struggle with demanding tasks and modern games.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Poco X5 Pro’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support is a massive advantage, achieving a 100% charge in just 45 minutes. The Cubot P80 lacks this fast-charging capability, relying on slower charging speeds. The Poco X5 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot P80 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and are willing to compromise on performance and camera quality. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro if you value a smoother user experience, better gaming capabilities, faster charging, and a more refined camera system, even if it means spending a bit more.