Cubot P80 vs Motorola Moto G84: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the Motorola Moto G84 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a more refined experience than the Mediatek MT8788V in the Cubot P80, and the 996 nits peak brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. The Moto G84's battery life also proves superior in real-world testing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot P80 | Motorola Moto G84 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 75.8 x 9.8 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.39 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) 0.3 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 24 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple, Pink, Light Blue | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | - | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
Cubot P80
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic tasks
- Older chipset architecture
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially shorter battery life
Motorola Moto G84
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Significantly brighter display (996 nits)
- Longer battery life (12:31h active use)
- Faster 30W charging
- Slightly higher price
- May still lack advanced camera features
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 996 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor use, where the Cubot P80’s display (brightness unspecified) will likely struggle. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Moto G84’s higher peak brightness translates to better readability in direct sunlight. We lack PWM frequency data for both, making it difficult to assess flicker-related eye strain, but the Moto G84’s superior brightness offers a more comfortable viewing experience overall.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited for both devices. However, given the market segment, we can assume both phones prioritize affordability over cutting-edge camera technology. The Moto G84 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better image processing and noise reduction compared to Mediatek’s offerings. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Moto G84’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) advantages suggest a more capable camera experience. We can expect both phones to struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G84’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represents a more modern and efficient architecture than the Cubot P80’s Mediatek MT8788V. The Snapdragon 695 features Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores, offering a balance of performance and power efficiency. The MT8788V, with its Cortex-A73 and A53 cores, is an older design. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process node provides better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained tasks. The Moto G84 will handle multitasking and moderately demanding apps more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 12:31h and an endurance rating of 117h. While the Cubot P80’s battery capacity is unknown, the Moto G84’s combination of a power-efficient chipset and optimized software results in significantly longer runtimes. The Moto G84 also supports 30W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the likely slower charging speeds of the Cubot P80. This makes the Moto G84 a better choice for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot P80 if you need a functional 5G phone on an extremely tight budget and are willing to accept compromises in performance and display quality. It's a viable option for basic tasks and light usage. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you prioritize a smoother user experience, a brighter and more usable display, and longer battery life, even if it means spending a bit more. It's ideal for users who stream videos, browse the web, and occasionally play mobile games.