Cubot Note 60 vs. Ulefone Note 17 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and smoother performance, the Ulefone Note 17 Pro is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset and significantly larger battery endurance outweigh the Cubot Note 60’s more modest specifications, despite the Cubot’s lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot Note 60 | Ulefone Note 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November | 2024, January 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November | Available. Released 2024, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 84.3 x 9.8 mm (6.98 x 3.32 x 0.39 in) | 163.8 x 74.2 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 254 g (8.96 oz) | 197.8 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP (wide), PDAF 5 MP (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Titan Grey | Velvet Black, Pearl White, Amber Orange |
| Price | $ 105.00 / £ 115.72 | About 300 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 27:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | 47:33h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class G | Class B |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class C (112 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class B |
Cubot Note 60
- Lower price point makes it more accessible.
- Adequate performance for basic tasks.
- 1000 charge cycles suggest good long-term battery health.
- Significantly shorter battery life compared to the Ulefone.
- Less powerful chipset results in slower performance.
Ulefone Note 17 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (47:33h endurance).
- More powerful and efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset.
- 33W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- Likely a higher price tag than the Cubot Note 60.
- May not be ideal for users solely focused on the absolute lowest cost.
Display Comparison
While display specifications are absent, the focus here is on the underlying performance impact. Both phones likely utilize LCD panels given their price bracket. However, the Ulefone Note 17 Pro’s Helio G99 chipset allows for potentially smoother scrolling and animations, even if the resolution and refresh rate are similar. The 6nm process node of the G99 also suggests better power efficiency, potentially contributing to longer screen-on time.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the processing power of the Helio G99 in the Ulefone Note 17 Pro likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but the G99’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than that found in Unisoc T615-based devices. We can assume both phones will feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor, but image quality will likely lean towards the Ulefone.
Performance
The Ulefone Note 17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 represents a significant upgrade over the Cubot Note 60’s Unisoc T615. The G99 features Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the T615’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance improvement in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. Furthermore, the G99 is fabricated on a 6nm process, offering superior power efficiency compared to the T615’s 12nm node, reducing thermal throttling and sustaining performance for longer periods. The Ulefone benefits users who play mobile games or use demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Note 17 Pro’s 47:33h endurance is a massive advantage over the Cubot Note 60’s 27:38h. This difference isn’t solely due to battery capacity (which is unspecified for both), but also the efficiency of the chipset. The 6nm Helio G99 consumes significantly less power than the 12nm Unisoc T615. The Ulefone also includes 33W wired charging, allowing for faster replenishment of the battery, while the Cubot’s charging speed is unknown. This makes the Ulefone ideal for users who dislike frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Note 60 if you need a functional, everyday smartphone with adequate performance for basic tasks and a lower upfront cost. It’s ideal for users who aren’t heavily reliant on their phones for gaming or demanding applications. Buy the Ulefone Note 17 Pro if you prioritize battery life above all else, frequently travel, or need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use, including gaming and video streaming. The G99 chipset also provides a noticeable performance boost for more demanding tasks.