The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Cubot Note 60 enters the arena promising exceptional battery life, while the Realme C55 counters with a brighter display and faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life, the Cubot Note 60 is the clear winner thanks to its remarkable 27:38h endurance. However, the Realme C55 offers a more visually appealing experience with its brighter screen and faster 33W charging, making it ideal for media consumers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 177.4 x 84.3 x 9.8 mm (6.98 x 3.32 x 0.39 in) | 165.6 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 254 g (8.96 oz) | 189.5 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~239 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 127.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP (wide), PDAF
5 MP (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Titan Grey | Sun Shower, Rainy Night, Rainforest |
| Models | - | RMX3710 |
| Price | $ 105.00 / £ 115.72 | ₹ 8,399 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1264:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-31.8 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 257263 (v9)
GeekBench: 1452 (v5.1), 1413 (v6)
GFXBench: 9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 27:38h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Cubot Note 60
- Exceptional battery life (27:38h endurance)
- Potentially longer battery lifespan with 1000 charge cycles
- Capable Unisoc T615 processor for everyday tasks
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lower quality
- Lacks fast charging capabilities
Realme C55
- Brighter display (659 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 33W charging (50% in 29 minutes)
- Slightly faster CPU performance with Helio G88
- Significantly shorter battery life (123h endurance)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Realme C55 immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 659 nits, significantly exceeding what we'd expect in this price bracket. While the Cubot Note 60’s display specs are absent, the Realme’s 1264:1 contrast ratio suggests a generally pleasing visual experience. The Realme’s brightness is a boon for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for budget devices. The lack of detailed display information for the Cubot Note 60 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Realme C55 clearly has the edge in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume both phones will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low light. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a camera-focused device; expect standard budget smartphone camera performance.
Performance
Both phones utilize 12nm process technology, but the CPUs differ. The Realme C55’s Mediatek Helio G88 features slightly faster Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz on the Cubot’s Unisoc T615). However, both chipsets share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency core configuration. In real-world usage, this translates to a marginal performance advantage for the Realme C55 in CPU-intensive tasks. The Unisoc T615 in the Cubot Note 60 is a capable performer for everyday tasks, but the Helio G88 offers a bit more headroom for gaming. Neither chipset is a powerhouse, but the Realme C55 has a slight edge.
Battery Life
This is where the Cubot Note 60 truly shines. Its reported 27:38h endurance rating dwarfs the Realme C55’s 123h. This massive difference suggests the Cubot Note 60’s battery optimization and potentially larger capacity (though not specified) are significantly more effective. While the Realme C55 compensates with 33W wired charging (50% in 29 minutes), the Cubot Note 60’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Realme C55 prioritizes quick top-ups, while the Cubot Note 60 focuses on extended runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Note 60 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from a power outlet. Buy the Realme C55 if you prioritize a brighter, more vibrant display for video streaming and gaming, and value the convenience of rapid 33W charging to quickly top up your battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the Unisoc T615 in the Cubot Note 60 handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T615 is capable, it's not a gaming powerhouse. Expect to play PUBG Mobile on medium settings with a stable, but not exceptionally high, frame rate. The Helio G88 in the Realme C55 will offer a slightly smoother experience, but neither phone is ideal for hardcore mobile gaming.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Realme C55 enough to fully charge the phone in under an hour?
Yes, the Realme C55's 33W charging can reach 50% charge in just 29 minutes. A full charge from 0% will likely take around 60-70 minutes, offering a convenient top-up speed for users who need a quick boost.
❓ Given the significant battery life difference, will the Cubot Note 60's battery degrade faster due to more frequent full charge cycles?
Not necessarily. The Cubot Note 60 is rated for 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a robust battery designed to withstand frequent use. Proper charging habits (avoiding overnight charging and keeping the battery between 20-80%) will further extend its lifespan.
