The smartphone market is crowded, but the Cubot Note 50 and Realme 11 Pro+ represent distinct approaches. The Note 50 aims for affordability, while the 11 Pro+ targets a more premium experience with faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you decide which aligns with your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Realme 11 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset and 100W charging significantly outperform the Cubot Note 50's Unisoc T606, justifying the price difference. However, the Note 50 remains a viable option for those on a strict budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 07 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 75.8 x 10.1 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.40 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 233 g (8.22 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 100W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Green, Blue | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | - | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
Cubot Note 50
- Significantly lower price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Substantially slower performance
- Inferior display quality
- Likely weaker camera system
Realme 11 Pro+
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 7050
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially less battery life than a larger capacity Cubot Note 50 (depending on usage)
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Cubot Note 50, whose display brightness is not specified but is likely considerably lower given its price point. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration contribute to a superior viewing experience. The Realme’s display is also likely to have a higher refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices. However, given the Realme 11 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). While the Cubot Note 50 may include a multi-camera setup, it’s probable that the image quality and low-light performance will be inferior. The Realme’s image processing algorithms are also likely more refined, resulting in more accurate colors and better dynamic range. We can assume the Realme will have a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 11 Pro+’s MediaTek Dimensity 7050, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance leap over the Cubot Note 50’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.6 GHz, provide significantly more processing power than the Note 50’s Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers will find the Realme 11 Pro+ far more capable.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer. While the Cubot Note 50’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Realme’s charging speed allows for a full charge in under 30 minutes. The Realme 11 Pro+ also has an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting efficient power management. While a larger battery capacity on the Cubot Note 50 might offer longer overall runtime, the convenience of ultra-fast charging on the Realme 11 Pro+ is a significant advantage for users who are constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Note 50 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is under $200. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you prioritize smooth multitasking, gaming, fast charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend more for a more refined experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Cubot Note 50 capable of handling demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc T606 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to play at lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops during intense moments. The chipset simply lacks the processing power and GPU performance of the Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+, which can handle PUBG Mobile at higher settings with smoother gameplay.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Realme 11 Pro+ with the 100W charger?
Realme claims the 11 Pro+ can charge from 0 to 100% in around 25 minutes. Real-world testing typically confirms this, with a full charge achievable in under 30 minutes, making it exceptionally convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Realme 11 Pro+ get noticeably warm during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7050’s 6nm process helps with thermal efficiency, but some warmth is expected during prolonged gaming. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ is likely to manage heat better than the Cubot Note 50 due to its more advanced chipset and potentially better cooling solutions, minimizing performance throttling.
