Cubot KingKong X vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Cubot KingKong X emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the BV8800 boasts a slightly longer endurance rating, the KingKong X’s faster charging and more modern processor make it the more compelling overall package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong X | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 23 | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7 mm (6.73 x 3.24 x 0.74 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 388 g (13.69 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~74.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 10200 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 15:41h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong X
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7050)
- More efficient 6nm process node
- Faster charging with PD support
- Shorter reported battery endurance rating
- Battery capacity not specified
Blackview BV8800
- Longer reported battery endurance rating (199h)
- Measured peak brightness of 501 nits
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Older and less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Less efficient 12nm process node
Display Comparison
Both devices share a 1348:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Blackview BV8800 provides a measured peak brightness of 501 nits, a crucial metric for outdoor visibility. While the KingKong X’s brightness isn’t specified, the BV8800’s figure provides a benchmark. Neither device details panel technology (IPS, AMOLED), which impacts color accuracy and viewing angles – a potential area for further investigation. Bezels are not specified, making direct comparison difficult.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the BV8800 is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality. A deeper dive into camera samples is needed to assess image quality.
Performance
The Cubot KingKong X’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 7050 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the G96’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. This, combined with the smaller 6nm process node, translates to greater efficiency and sustained performance under load. The KingKong X is expected to handle demanding games and multitasking with considerably more ease. The G96 is a capable chip, but is showing its age against newer offerings.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8800 claims an endurance rating of 199 hours, while the Cubot KingKong X achieves 15:41h (approximately 349 minutes). However, endurance ratings are dependent on testing methodology. The KingKong X compensates with 33W wired charging with PD, offering 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes on the BV8800. The KingKong X’s 1400 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan before significant battery degradation. The BV8800 also offers reverse wired charging, a niche feature for powering other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong X if you prioritize performance for gaming, demanding apps, or future-proofing. Its Dimensity 7050 offers a substantial leap in processing power. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if maximizing battery life is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. The BV8800’s endurance rating is impressive, but comes at the cost of processing speed.