Cubot KingKong X Pro vs. Nokia XR20: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and extended battery life, the Cubot KingKong X Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset delivers significantly faster performance than the XR20’s Snapdragon 480. However, the Nokia XR20 remains a compelling option for those valuing long-term software support and a more balanced, reliable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong X Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 01 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 83.3 x 18.4 mm (6.93 x 3.28 x 0.72 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 392 g (13.83 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 24GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro), AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10200 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | € 349.95 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 88:59h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong X Pro
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Outstanding battery life (88:59h endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Likely higher price point
- Software update commitment may be shorter than Nokia
Nokia XR20
- Guaranteed software updates from Nokia
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Wireless charging support
- Reputation for reliable durability
- Significantly slower performance compared to the KingKong X Pro
- Slower 18W wired charging
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market positioning, we can infer differences. The KingKong X Pro, aiming for higher performance, likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz) for smoother visuals. The XR20, prioritizing efficiency, likely uses a standard 60Hz panel. Bezels are likely similar given the rugged design constraints. Color accuracy is also unknown, but Nokia typically prioritizes color calibration, potentially giving it an edge in this area.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the chipset difference suggests a significant advantage for the KingKong X Pro in image processing capabilities. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the XR20’s Snapdragon 480 ISP is less powerful than the Dimensity 8200’s. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims, but the KingKong X Pro is likely to produce sharper, more detailed images, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume both will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially a depth or macro sensor, but the KingKong X Pro’s image processing will likely elevate the overall quality.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Cubot KingKong X Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset boasting an octa-core configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core (3.1 GHz) and multiple performance cores (3x3.0 GHz). This contrasts sharply with the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm), which utilizes a more modest octa-core setup with Kryo 460 cores peaking at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 offers significantly better power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to sustained performance under load. The XR20 will be adequate for basic tasks, but the KingKong X Pro will handle demanding games and applications with ease.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong X Pro boasts an impressive 88:59h endurance rating, indicating exceptional battery life. While the capacity isn't specified, this endurance, combined with the efficient 4nm Dimensity 8200, suggests a large battery optimized for longevity. The XR20’s battery life is not provided, but its less powerful chipset and 8nm process will likely result in shorter runtimes. The KingKong X Pro’s 33W wired charging is faster than the XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong X Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its superior processing power and impressive 88:59h battery endurance make it ideal for power users. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a dependable, long-lasting device with guaranteed software updates and a focus on practical durability for everyday use, even if it means sacrificing some processing speed.