Cubot KingKong X Pro vs. Motorola Defy 2: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and exceptional battery endurance, the Cubot KingKong X Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset and 88:59h battery life significantly outperform the Motorola Defy 2, making it ideal for power users and those frequently away from a charger. However, the Defy 2’s wireless charging offers a compelling alternative for convenience-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong X Pro | Motorola Defy 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 23, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 01 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 83.3 x 18.4 mm (6.93 x 3.28 x 0.72 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 392 g (13.83 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 24GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 10200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | € 349.95 | About 570 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 88:59h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong X Pro
- Superior processing power with the Dimensity 8200
- Exceptional battery life (88:59h endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Software experience may be less refined than Motorola
Motorola Defy 2
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android)
- More compact design (likely, given Motorola's history)
- Significantly less powerful chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Lower battery endurance (implied)
- Slower charging speeds overall
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications in the provided data. However, given the KingKong X Pro’s focus on performance, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel to complement the powerful chipset. The Defy 2, leaning towards practicality, may prioritize power efficiency over refresh rate. Bezels are likely similar across both devices, given their ruggedized designs, prioritizing protection over minimal aesthetics. Color accuracy is unknown, but both will likely aim for acceptable, rather than professional-grade, color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct camera comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the KingKong X Pro will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Defy 2’s ISP, while competent, will be constrained by the Dimensity 930’s processing capabilities. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility; focusing on the main sensor’s quality is more important.
Performance
The Cubot KingKong X Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) chipset is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, significantly surpasses the Motorola Defy 2’s Dimensity 930 (6nm). While the 6nm process of the Defy 2’s chip is more efficient, the architectural advantages and higher clock speeds of the Dimensity 8200 translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Cortex-A78 cores in the KingKong X Pro are also more powerful than those in the Defy 2. The KingKong X Pro will benefit users who engage in resource-intensive activities.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong X Pro boasts an impressive 88:59h endurance, a testament to its efficient chipset and likely larger battery capacity (though not specified). This is a significant advantage over the Motorola Defy 2, which lacks endurance data but compensates with 15W wireless charging. The KingKong X Pro’s 33W wired charging is faster, allowing for quicker top-ups, but the Defy 2’s wireless charging provides unparalleled convenience for users who prefer cable-free charging. The KingKong X Pro’s 1400 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong X Pro if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or extended outdoor use where charging opportunities are limited. Its superior chipset and battery life will keep you going. Buy the Motorola Defy 2 if you prioritize wireless charging convenience, a cleaner software experience, and are willing to trade some processing power and battery endurance for those features. It’s a better fit for everyday use and less intensive tasks.