Cubot KingKong X Pro vs. Blackview BV8800: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and extended battery life, the Cubot KingKong X Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power over the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. However, the BV8800 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a reliable rugged phone.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong X Pro | Blackview BV8800 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 01 | 2021, December 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November | Available. Released 2022, January 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 83.3 x 18.4 mm (6.93 x 3.28 x 0.72 in) | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 392 g (13.83 oz) | 367 g (12.95 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 7 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 24GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 10200 mAh | 8380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | € 349.95 | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 199h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 88:59h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class C | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong X Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8200)
- Exceptional battery endurance (88:59h)
- Long battery lifespan (1400 cycles)
- Display brightness and panel type unknown
- Charging speed details not provided
Blackview BV8800
- Good display brightness (501 nits)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- More affordable price point
- Slower processor (Helio G96)
- Significantly shorter battery endurance (199h)
- Limited camera details
Display Comparison
Both devices share a 1348:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Blackview BV8800’s measured 501 nits of peak brightness provides a tangible advantage in direct sunlight, making it easier to view the screen outdoors. While the Cubot KingKong X Pro’s display specs are not provided, the BV8800’s brightness is a key differentiator for outdoor usability. The lack of information on the X Pro’s panel type (e.g., IPS, AMOLED) makes a detailed comparison difficult, but the BV8800’s contrast ratio is a solid baseline.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. The BV8800’s inclusion of a contrast ratio specification suggests some image processing tuning, but the lack of detail prevents a meaningful assessment. It’s safe to assume the X Pro, given its higher processing power, has the potential for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, but this remains unconfirmed. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the BV8800 is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Cubot KingKong X Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4nm) is a flagship-class chipset featuring a tri-cluster configuration with a high-clocked Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Blackview BV8800’s Helio G96 (12nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning the X Pro will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling. The X Pro’s CPU architecture is also more modern, offering better single-core and multi-core performance.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong X Pro boasts an impressive 88:59h endurance rating and a 1400 cycle lifespan, indicating exceptional battery life and longevity. This significantly surpasses the Blackview BV8800’s 199h endurance rating. While both phones support 33W wired charging, the BV8800 provides more detailed charging times: 31% in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. The X Pro’s charging speed is not specified, but its superior battery endurance means it may not require as frequent charging. The BV8800’s reverse wired charging capability is a unique feature absent in the X Pro, allowing it to function as a power bank for other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong X Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, graphically intensive gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if long-term battery endurance is a priority. Buy the Blackview BV8800 if you prefer a more affordable rugged phone for basic communication, navigation, and photography, and if you value reverse wired charging for powering other devices in the field.