Cubot KingKong Power vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Cat S75 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 930 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency. However, the Cubot KingKong Power provides a compelling value proposition for those needing a durable phone on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong Power | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 169.9 x 80.2 x 20 mm (6.69 x 3.16 x 0.79 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 382 g (13.47 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~74.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF 20 MP, (night vision camera), 2 IR emitters 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 10600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Cubot KingKong Power
- Faster Wired Charging (33W)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- More Affordable Price Point
- Older, Less Powerful Chipset
- Less Efficient Processor
Cat S75
- Significantly Faster Processor (Dimensity 930)
- More Efficient 6nm Process
- Wireless Charging Convenience
- Slower Charging Speed (15W Wireless)
- Higher Price
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S75's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate. The Cubot KingKong Power, focusing on cost-effectiveness, likely utilizes a more basic LCD panel. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display fidelity, so expect both to have reinforced glass, but the Cat S75 may have a more scratch-resistant coating.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Cat S75’s higher-end chipset suggests a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the Cat S75 is more likely to have a larger primary sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS), crucial for low-light photography. The MT8788V in the KingKong Power will likely result in slower image processing and less detail in challenging lighting conditions. Expect the Cat S75 to offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Cubot KingKong Power’s Mediatek MT8788V/WA. The Dimensity 930 utilizes more modern CPU cores – 2x Cortex-A78 at 2.2 GHz versus the KingKong Power’s 4x Cortex-A73 at 2.0 GHz – resulting in significantly faster single-core performance. The 6nm process node also contributes to improved power efficiency, meaning the Cat S75 will likely run cooler and maintain performance for longer under sustained load. The KingKong Power’s older architecture will struggle with demanding tasks and multitasking compared to the Cat S75.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong Power boasts 33W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging. While wireless charging offers convenience, it’s considerably slower. The KingKong Power will likely achieve a full charge in under 90 minutes, while the Cat S75 could take over two hours. Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the Cat S75’s more efficient Dimensity 930 may offset a potentially smaller battery size. The KingKong Power also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Cat S75, allowing it to charge other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong Power if you need a highly durable phone for demanding work environments and prioritize battery life and fast charging over top-tier performance. It’s ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts on a budget, or anyone who frequently drops their phone. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a more refined user experience, faster app loading times, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and potentially battery longevity.