Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs Doogee S99: A Head-to-Head Rugged Smartphone Showdown

The rugged smartphone market is booming, offering devices built to withstand drops, dust, and water. The Cubot KingKong Ace 3 and Doogee S99 both aim to deliver durability without breaking the bank, but they differ significantly in their internal hardware. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which phone offers the best balance of performance, features, and value for users needing a truly resilient device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users prioritizing overall performance and convenience, the Doogee S99 emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G96 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the KingKong Ace 3’s Helio G88, and the addition of wireless charging and reverse wired charging adds significant usability. However, the KingKong Ace 3 remains a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.

PHONES
Phone Names Cubot KingKong Ace 3 Doogee S99
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2024, June 282022, December 05
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, July 23Available. Released 2022, December 05
Body
Dimensions173.9 x 81.8 x 12.7 mm (6.85 x 3.22 x 0.5 in)172 x 82 x 15.5 mm (6.77 x 3.23 x 0.61 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight284 g (10.02 oz)-
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~73.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~69.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Helio G88 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MC2
OSAndroid 14Android 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal256GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro)-
FeaturesLED flashDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple-108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 64 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/1.8, 130˚ (ultrawide)
VideoYes1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single32 MP32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackUnspecifiedNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedFM radio
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired33W wired, 45% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wired
Type5100 mAh6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack/OrangeGold, Black
Price-About 250 EUR

Cubot KingKong Ace 3

  • More affordable price point
  • Rugged design for durability
  • Reliable performance for basic tasks

  • Less powerful processor
  • Lacks wireless charging
  • Potentially lower camera quality

Doogee S99

  • More powerful Helio G96 chipset
  • Wireless and reverse wired charging
  • Improved image processing capabilities

  • Higher price compared to Cubot Ace 3
  • Rugged design may be bulky
  • Battery life may be similar to Ace 3 despite efficiency gains

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but durability. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the emphasis is on scratch resistance and impact protection. The lack of high refresh rates is expected, prioritizing battery life over visual smoothness. Bezels are likely substantial on both, contributing to the rugged aesthetic and providing a buffer against impacts.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The Helio G96 includes a more capable image signal processor (ISP) than the G88, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality of the sensors and lenses will be crucial. We can assume both will include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the megapixel counts and aperture values are unknown. The ISP advantage of the Doogee S99 will likely result in more detailed and vibrant photos.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S99’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm) represents a clear upgrade over the Cubot KingKong Ace 3’s Helio G88 (12nm). The G96 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, compared to the Ace 3’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architectural shift, combined with the slightly higher clock speed, translates to approximately 15-20% better CPU performance in benchmarks. The GPU within the G96 also offers a performance advantage, making the S99 the better choice for mobile gaming. Both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the G96’s superior processing power will be the limiting factor for demanding applications.

Battery Life

Both devices feature 33W wired charging, offering reasonably fast charging speeds. The Doogee S99 gains a significant advantage with the inclusion of 15W wireless charging and reverse wired charging. This allows for convenient charging without cables and the ability to top up other devices. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Helio G96 in the S99 may offset any potential capacity difference. The Doogee S99’s 45% charge in 30 minutes claim suggests a slightly faster charging implementation, even with the same 33W rating.

Buying Guide

Buy the Cubot KingKong Ace 3 if you need a highly durable phone on a strict budget and prioritize simplicity. It’s ideal for users who primarily need a reliable device for basic communication and light tasks. Buy the Doogee S99 if you prefer a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, and value the convenience of wireless charging and reverse charging capabilities. This phone suits users who demand more from their rugged device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Doogee S99’s Helio G96 chipset get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Cubot KingKong Ace 3?
While the Helio G96 is more powerful, it also generates more heat. The Doogee S99 likely incorporates thermal management solutions (heat pipes, graphite sheets) to mitigate this. However, users engaging in prolonged, graphically intensive gaming may experience some warming, which is typical for phones in this price range. The Ace 3’s G88 will generate less heat, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 15W wireless charging on the Doogee S99 significantly slower than the 33W wired charging?
Yes, 15W wireless charging is considerably slower than 33W wired charging. Expect a full charge via wireless to take approximately 3-4 hours, while wired charging will achieve a full charge in around 1.5-2 hours. Wireless charging prioritizes convenience over speed.
❓ How effective are the ruggedization features on both phones – specifically, what IP rating do they have?
While the exact IP rating isn't provided, both phones are marketed as rugged devices, meaning they should offer protection against dust and water. Expect at least an IP68 rating, indicating full dust ingress protection and the ability to withstand immersion in water up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. However, the specific level of protection can vary.