Cubot KingKong Ace 3 vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Cat S75 is the clear winner thanks to its superior Dimensity 930 chipset. However, the Cubot KingKong Ace 3 provides a compelling alternative for those on a tighter budget who value faster wired charging and don't need top-tier processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong Ace 3 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 28 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, July 23 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 173.9 x 81.8 x 12.7 mm (6.85 x 3.22 x 0.5 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 284 g (10.02 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~73.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 100 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black/Orange | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | - | About 600 EUR |
Cubot KingKong Ace 3
- Faster 33W wired charging for quick power-ups.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Rugged design for durability in harsh environments.
- Significantly less powerful Mediatek Helio G88 chipset.
- No wireless charging support.
- Potentially lower display quality.
Cat S75
- Superior performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 930.
- Convenient 15W wireless charging.
- More efficient 6nm process for better battery life.
- Slower 15W wireless charging compared to the Cubot's wired speed.
- Likely a higher price tag.
- May not offer the absolute fastest wired charging speeds.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S75's higher price point, it likely features a more color-accurate panel and potentially higher peak brightness. Rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality, so expect both to have robust glass protection, but potentially lower peak brightness than flagship smartphones. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both to reinforce structural integrity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Cat S75 will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the Cat S75’s processing power will allow it to extract more detail and clarity from its sensors. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Cat S75, a common feature in phones with higher-end chipsets, would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume both will include a standard macro lens, but its utility will be limited by the sensor size.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Cubot KingKong Ace 3’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm). The Dimensity 930 utilizes more efficient 6nm fabrication, allowing for higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75) and improved sustained performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Cat S75. The Helio G88 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or demanding applications. The Dimensity 930’s architecture also benefits from a more modern GPU, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Cat S75 compensates for potentially lower mAh with 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Cubot KingKong Ace 3. The Cubot counters with significantly faster 33W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in a shorter timeframe. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 930 in the Cat S75 is more power-efficient, potentially offsetting a smaller battery capacity with longer real-world usage. The choice here depends on user preference: convenience of wireless charging versus speed of wired charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong Ace 3 if you need a highly durable phone for demanding physical work and prioritize fast 33W wired charging for quick top-ups. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a more refined user experience, benefit from the significantly faster Dimensity 930 processor for multitasking and demanding apps, and appreciate the convenience of 15W wireless charging.