The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 and ZTE Blade A76 4G represent two distinct approaches. The KingKong Ace 2 aims for durability with a ruggedized design, while the Blade A76 4G prioritizes maximizing battery life. This comparison dissects their core specifications to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the ZTE Blade A76 4G is the clear winner. Its 54:20h battery endurance significantly outpaces the Cubot KingKong Ace 2’s 43:59h, despite the Ace 2’s more powerful processor. While the Ace 2 offers a performance edge, the Blade A76 4G’s superior battery life is more impactful for daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025, October |
| Status | Available. Released 2024 | Available. Released 2025, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 173.9 x 81.8 x 12.7 mm (6.85 x 3.22 x 0.5 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 283 g (9.98 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~72.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.75 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | - |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | Yes |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Unspecified |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Yes |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black/Orange, Black/Green | Silver, Gold, Violet |
| Models | - | Z2474 |
| Price | - | € 93.19 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 43:59h endurance, 900 cycles | 54:20h endurance, 800 cycles |
| Energy | Class C | Class A |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class B |
Cubot KingKong Ace 2
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Ruggedized design offers enhanced durability
- Higher battery cycle count (900)
- Significantly shorter battery life (43:59h)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Potentially lower display quality due to ruggedization
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Exceptional battery life (54:20h)
- Faster charging speed (22.5W)
- Potentially more efficient processor
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Standard build quality – less durable
- Lower battery cycle count (800)
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the price points, both devices likely feature LCD panels. The lack of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness, color accuracy, or refresh rates. However, the ruggedized nature of the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 suggests a potentially thicker glass covering, which could impact clarity. The ZTE Blade A76 4G, lacking this requirement, may have a slightly more visually appealing display.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the absence of any mention of high-resolution sensors or advanced features suggests both phones utilize basic camera setups. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. It’s reasonable to assume both devices include a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor, but image processing capabilities will likely be similar, focusing on basic scene optimization.
Performance
The Cubot KingKong Ace 2’s Mediatek Helio G85 chipset, featuring a 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, offers a clear performance advantage over the ZTE Blade A76 4G’s unspecified octa-core CPU clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores provide significantly better single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. However, this performance comes at the cost of efficiency; the Ace 2’s shorter battery endurance confirms this trade-off. The 12nm process node of the Helio G85 is also less efficient than a potentially newer, smaller node used in the Blade A76 4G’s chipset, further contributing to the battery life difference.
Battery Life
The ZTE Blade A76 4G’s 54:20h battery endurance is the standout feature of this comparison. Despite a slightly slower 22.5W charging speed compared to the Cubot KingKong Ace 2’s 18W, the Blade A76 4G’s superior efficiency allows it to remain powered for significantly longer. The Ace 2’s 43:59h endurance, while respectable, falls short. The Blade A76 4G also boasts 800 battery cycles compared to the Ace 2’s 900, but the endurance difference is far more impactful than the cycle count.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 if you need a rugged phone capable of withstanding drops and harsh environments, and you value a more responsive processor for occasional gaming. Buy the ZTE Blade A76 4G if you prioritize all-day (and multi-day) battery life, and your usage primarily consists of communication, social media, and light web browsing. The Blade A76 4G is the better choice for users who frequently travel or have limited access to charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G85 chipset in the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The longer battery life of the ZTE Blade A76 4G would allow for longer gaming sessions, even with similar settings.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the ZTE Blade A76 4G compared to the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 in real-world use?
While the ZTE Blade A76 4G’s 22.5W charging is faster than the Ace 2’s 18W, the difference won’t be dramatic. Expect a slightly quicker top-up, but the Blade A76 4G’s superior battery efficiency means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently overall.
❓ Is the ruggedized design of the Cubot KingKong Ace 2 worth the trade-off in battery life?
That depends on your lifestyle. If you work in a physically demanding environment or are prone to dropping your phone, the Ace 2’s durability is a significant benefit. However, if you primarily use your phone indoors and prioritize battery life, the ZTE Blade A76 4G is the better choice.
