Cubot KingKong 11 vs. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users prioritizing performance and battery longevity, the Cubot KingKong 11 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the XCover Pro’s aging Exynos 9611, and the 33W charging is a welcome addition. However, Samsung’s software ecosystem and established reputation for reliability may sway some buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong 11 | Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 20, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66 - Canada | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2020, January |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2020, January |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 176 x 84.1 x 18.7 mm (6.93 x 3.31 x 0.74 in) | 159.9 x 76.7 x 10 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant* *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide), AF | 25 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, dual infrared LED | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/k/v/r, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 10200 mAh | Li-Po 4050 mAh, removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Models | - | SM-G715FN/DS, SM-G715FN, SM-G715F, SM-G715W, SM-G715U, SM-G715U1 |
| Price | € 254.95 / $ 196.64 / £ 265.99 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:46h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong 11
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7025)
- Superior battery endurance (40:46h)
- Faster charging (33W)
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
- Software update support may be less consistent
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
- Established brand reputation (Samsung)
- Guaranteed software updates (Samsung)
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Outdated processor (Exynos 9611)
- Slower charging (15W)
- Lower performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature durable displays, the provided data focuses on internal components. The XCover Pro’s display is known to be a 5.65-inch TFT LCD, a technology that typically lags behind modern AMOLED panels in color accuracy and contrast. The KingKong 11’s display specs are not provided, but given its price point, it’s likely a similar LCD. The absence of high refresh rate information on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the primary sensors. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the XCover Pro’s camera system is known to be fairly basic, prioritizing functionality over image quality. The KingKong 11’s camera specs are unknown, but the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) capabilities are likely superior to the older Exynos 9611, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Cubot KingKong 11’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) is a modern chipset featuring a Cortex-A78 based core configuration, offering significantly improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro’s Exynos 9611 (10nm). The Dimensity 7025’s newer architecture and smaller fabrication node translate to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Exynos 9611, while capable for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games or multitasking. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7025 is a key advantage, allowing for higher transistor density and improved performance per watt.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong 11’s 40:46h endurance is a standout feature, indicating exceptional battery life. While the battery capacity isn’t specified, the Dimensity 7025’s power efficiency plays a crucial role. The XCover Pro’s battery life is adequate, but falls short of the KingKong 11. The 33W wired charging on the KingKong 11 is a significant advantage over the XCover Pro’s 15W charging, drastically reducing recharge times. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong 11 if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks, offers exceptional battery life with 40:46h endurance, and benefits from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize raw performance and value. Buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro if you prefer a more established brand with a guaranteed software update path, and prioritize Samsung’s ecosystem integration, even if it means sacrificing some processing power and charging speed.