Cubot KingKong 11 vs. Nokia XR20: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and extended battery life, the Cubot KingKong 11 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset and impressive 40:46h endurance significantly outperform the Nokia XR20’s Snapdragon 480, making it ideal for demanding tasks and outdoor adventures. However, the XR20’s software support and wireless charging are compelling alternatives.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot KingKong 11 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 176 x 84.1 x 18.7 mm (6.93 x 3.31 x 0.74 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~73.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, dual infrared LED | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 10200 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | € 254.95 / $ 196.64 / £ 265.99 | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 40:46h endurance, 1400 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class C (90 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Cubot KingKong 11
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 7025
- Exceptional battery life (40:46h endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Longer battery lifespan (1400 cycles)
- Brand recognition is lower than Nokia
- Software update commitment is unknown
Nokia XR20
- Established brand reputation and software support
- Convenience of 15W wireless charging
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially better color calibration
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Slower 18W wired charging
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the market segment, both likely feature LCD panels optimized for outdoor visibility. The XR20, given Nokia’s focus on usability, may have slightly better color calibration. However, without specific data on brightness (nits) or resolution, a definitive comparison is impossible. The KingKong 11’s rugged design may necessitate a thicker glass cover, potentially impacting clarity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. However, the absence of any mention of advanced features like OIS on either device suggests a focus on practicality over photographic excellence. Both phones likely rely heavily on software processing to enhance images. The XR20, benefiting from Nokia’s image processing expertise, might offer more natural-looking results, while the KingKong 11 could prioritize vibrant colors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Cubot KingKong 11’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – compared to the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7025 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. This means the KingKong 11 will handle graphically intensive tasks and multitasking more smoothly. The Snapdragon 480 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will likely show signs of strain under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Cubot KingKong 11’s battery endurance of 40:46h is a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Nokia XR20, given its chipset. The 33W wired charging on the KingKong 11 is also faster than the XR20’s 18W wired and 15W wireless charging. While wireless charging is a convenience feature on the XR20, the KingKong 11’s faster wired charging and superior endurance mean less time tethered to a power outlet. The KingKong 11 also boasts a claimed 1400 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot KingKong 11 if you need a rugged phone for demanding applications like mobile gaming, heavy multitasking, or extended use in remote locations where charging isn't readily available. Its superior chipset and battery life will be invaluable. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize long-term software support, a more established brand reputation, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.