The smartphone market is flooded with options, but at the very bottom end, choices become limited. We're pitting the Cubot ID206 against the Energizer E20+ – two devices aimed at users prioritizing absolute affordability. However, the comparison is heavily skewed by the complete lack of published specifications for the Cubot ID206, making this a comparison of known quantity versus unknown potential.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user needing a functional, albeit basic, mobile phone, the Energizer E20+ is the safer bet. Its Mediatek MT6261D chipset provides a known, if limited, experience. The Cubot ID206, lacking any published specs, represents a significant gamble with potentially unknown limitations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | - |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | Yes |
| Speed | No | - |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2023, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 40 x 40 x 12 mm (1.57 x 1.57 x 0.47 in) | 105 x 52.6 x 19.9 mm (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.78 in) |
| SIM | No | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | - |
| Resolution | 240 x 280 pixels (~217 ppi density) | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.7 inches | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 (~32.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Single-core 260 MHz |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6261D |
| OS | Proprietary OS | - |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | Yes |
| Card slot | No | microSDHC |
| Phonebook | - | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | - | QVGA |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 3.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | No | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | - | No |
| Java | - | No |
| Messaging | - | SMS |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 300 mAh | 1000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink | Black |
| Price | - | About 20 EUR |
Cubot ID206
- Potential for surprisingly low price
- Unknown specs could indicate hidden features
- May offer a unique design
- Completely unknown specifications
- Potential for poor performance
- Lack of support and updates
Energizer E20+
- Known and reliable performance (for its class)
- Long battery life due to low-power chipset
- Affordable price point
- Extremely limited functionality
- Slow processor
- Basic camera
Display Comparison
The Energizer E20+’s display specifications are unavailable, but given its target market, it likely features a low-resolution LCD panel. The Cubot ID206’s display is entirely unknown. Without knowing the panel technology, resolution, or brightness of either device, a meaningful comparison is impossible. Both are likely to prioritize cost over visual fidelity, meaning limited viewing angles and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both devices are sparse. The Energizer E20+ likely includes a basic camera for capturing simple photos, but image quality will be limited by the sensor size and processing capabilities of the MT6261D. The Cubot ID206’s camera is a complete mystery. Given the price point, both devices will likely struggle in low-light conditions and lack advanced features like image stabilization or high-resolution recording.
Performance
The Energizer E20+ is powered by the Mediatek MT6261D chipset, featuring a single-core 260 MHz CPU. This is a very basic processor designed for feature phone functionality – making calls, sending texts, and perhaps running simple applications. The Cubot ID206’s chipset is completely unknown. The MT6261D’s single-core architecture means multitasking will be extremely limited on the E20+, and responsiveness will be slow. The ID206 could potentially offer more performance, but without specifications, it could also be significantly slower.
Battery Life
Battery capacity for both the Cubot ID206 and Energizer E20+ are not publicly available. However, given the low-power chipset in the E20+, battery life is likely to be several days on a single charge with minimal usage. The ID206’s battery life is entirely dependent on its unknown chipset and battery capacity. The E20+'s simple functionality means it will likely outperform any smartphone in standby time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot ID206 if you are willing to take a risk on an unknown quantity, potentially finding a surprisingly capable device for the price. However, be prepared for potentially limited functionality and support. Buy the Energizer E20+ if you need a reliable, basic mobile phone for calls and texts, and value predictability over potential performance gains. It's ideal for those needing a secondary phone or a simple device for essential communication.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Energizer E20+ a smartphone?
No, the Energizer E20+ is a feature phone. It runs on a basic operating system and is primarily designed for calls and texts. It does not support advanced smartphone features like app stores or complex multitasking.
❓ What kind of SIM card does the Energizer E20+ use?
The Energizer E20+ typically supports a single SIM card, likely in the standard Mini-SIM (2FF) format. This is common for feature phones targeting basic communication needs.
❓ Can I browse the internet on the Energizer E20+?
While the Energizer E20+ may have limited internet connectivity via 2G, the experience will be extremely slow and data-intensive. It's not suitable for regular web browsing.
❓ What are the risks of buying the Cubot ID206 given the lack of information?
The primary risk is purchasing a device that doesn't meet your needs. Without specifications, you don't know its performance, battery life, or even basic functionality. It could be significantly worse than the Energizer E20+.
