Doogee S110 vs Cubot Hafury V1: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value

Both the Cubot Hafury V1 and the Doogee S110 target the budget-conscious consumer, but they approach the market with different strategies. The Hafury V1 represents a more traditional, cost-optimized approach, while the S110 aims to deliver a more modern chipset and significantly faster charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Doogee S110 is the superior choice. Its Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance boost over the Cubot Hafury V1’s older 12nm MT8788V. The 66W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing recharge times compared to the V1’s 18W charging.

PHONES
Phone Names	Cubot Hafury V1	Doogee S110

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA, LTE
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE

Launch
Announced	2024, April 02	2023, August 03
Status	Available. Released 2024, April	Available. Released 2023, August

Body
Dimensions	165.8 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)	178.5 x 83.1 x 17.9 mm (7.03 x 3.27 x 0.70 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	200 g (7.05 oz)	390 g (13.76 oz)

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution	1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size	6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)	6.58 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~70.5% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	IPS LCD, 120Hz

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Mediatek MT8788V/WA (12 nm)	Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
GPU	Mali-G72 MP3	Mali-G57 MC2
OS	Android 13	Android 13

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	256GB 8GB RAM	256GB 12GB RAM

Main Camera
Features	LED flash	Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple	64 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 24 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights 16 MP, f/2.2, 130˚ (ultrawide)
Video	1080p@30fps	1440p, 1080p

Selfie camera
Single	32 MP	32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1440p, 1080p

Sound
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.2, A2DP	5.2, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Radio	Unspecified	FM radio
USB	USB Type-C, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	18W wired	66W wired Reverse wired
Type	4350 mAh	10800 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Pink, Light Blue	Black, Silver, Gold
Price	About 150 EUR	About 320 EUR

Cubot Hafury V1

Lowest possible price point
Functional for basic tasks
Potentially longer standby time due to less powerful chipset

Outdated chipset with limited performance
Slow 18W charging
Likely inferior camera performance

Doogee S110

Significantly faster Helio G99 processor
Ultra-fast 66W charging with reverse charging
Improved power efficiency and thermal management

Higher price compared to the Cubot Hafury V1
May require more frequent charging if heavily used
Potentially less standby time than the V1

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the target price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Doogee S110, being a newer device, may benefit from improved color calibration and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rate support on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature budget-oriented camera systems. The Doogee S110, benefiting from the more powerful ISP within the Helio G99, likely offers better image processing capabilities, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance, but a larger sensor generally equates to better image quality in challenging lighting conditions.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Doogee S110’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cubot Hafury V1’s MediaTek MT8788V/WA (12nm). The 6nm process node of the G99 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance under load. The G99’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – also offers a performance advantage over the V1’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. While both are octa-core, the Cortex-A76 cores in the G99 are architecturally superior, delivering better single-core performance. This will be noticeable in app launch times and general responsiveness.

Battery Life

The charging speed is a clear win for the Doogee S110. Its 66W wired charging is a massive leap over the Cubot Hafury V1’s 18W charging. This translates to significantly faster recharge times – potentially going from 0-100% in under an hour, compared to several hours on the V1. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the G99’s superior power efficiency means the S110 will likely deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The S110 also supports reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the V1, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices.

Buying Guide

Buy the Cubot Hafury V1 if you prioritize absolute lowest cost and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Doogee S110 if you value smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and if you need a phone that can be quickly recharged, minimizing downtime. The S110 is also a better choice for users who anticipate using more demanding applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Doogee S110’s Helio G99 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?

The Helio G99 is a capable chipset for gaming, and should allow for playable frame rates in PUBG Mobile at medium settings. While it won’t deliver a flagship-level experience, it’s a significant improvement over the MT8788V in the Cubot Hafury V1, which would likely struggle with consistent performance.

❓ How long does it *actually* take to charge the Doogee S110 from 0% to 100% with the 66W charger?

While exact charging times vary based on usage, the Doogee S110 with its 66W charging should reach 100% in approximately 45-60 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Cubot Hafury V1, which could take 2-3 hours or more with its 18W charger.

❓ Is the MT8788V in the Cubot Hafury V1 sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?

Yes, the MT8788V is adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging. However, you may experience noticeable slowdowns when multitasking or running more demanding applications. The Doogee S110 offers a much smoother and more responsive experience for these tasks.