Cubot Hafury V1 vs Cat S75: Which Rugged Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Cat S75 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 930 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power and efficiency over the Hafury V1’s MT8788V. However, the Hafury V1 remains a compelling option for those on a tight budget who still require a durable device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot Hafury V1 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 02 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 4350 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink, Light Blue | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Cubot Hafury V1
- More affordable price point
- Faster wired charging (18W)
- Rugged design for durability
- Older, less efficient chipset (MT8788V)
- Potentially lower performance in demanding tasks
- Lacks wireless charging
Cat S75
- More powerful and efficient chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Wireless charging convenience (15W)
- Superior performance for gaming and multitasking
- Higher price tag
- Slower wired charging compared to Hafury V1
- Potentially larger size/weight due to more advanced components
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Cat S75's higher price point and more modern chipset, it's reasonable to expect a brighter panel with better color accuracy. The Hafury V1, targeting a lower price bracket, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution. Bezels are likely to be larger on the Hafury V1 to reduce manufacturing costs. The absence of refresh rate data suggests both likely operate at a standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Cat S75’s more powerful chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of sensor size information makes it hard to assess image quality, but the Cat S75’s processing capabilities suggest a more refined camera experience. It's likely the Hafury V1 relies on simpler image processing to conserve resources.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Cubot Hafury V1’s Mediatek MT8788V (12nm). The 6nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially longer sustained performance. Architecturally, the Dimensity 930’s Cortex-A78 cores are significantly more powerful than the Hafury V1’s Cortex-A73 cores, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The Hafury V1’s Cortex-A53 cores are also less efficient than the Cat S75’s Cortex-A55 cores. This difference will be most noticeable in graphically intensive tasks and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging is a significant advantage, offering convenient top-ups without needing a cable. The Hafury V1’s 18W wired charging is faster, but lacks the convenience of wireless charging. The Dimensity 930’s superior power efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Cat S75, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The 12nm process of the MT8788V will likely result in higher power draw, potentially requiring more frequent charging on the Hafury V1.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Hafury V1 if you need a genuinely affordable rugged phone for basic tasks like communication, navigation, and light media consumption, and aren't concerned with demanding gaming or intensive multitasking. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a more responsive and capable device that can handle demanding applications, extended gaming sessions, and benefit from the convenience of wireless charging, even if it comes at a higher price point.