Cubot Hafury V1 vs. Blackview BV9300: Which Budget Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and faster charging, the Blackview BV9300 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Cubot Hafury V1’s MT8788V, and the 33W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Hafury V1 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot Hafury V1 | Blackview BV9300 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 02 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.53 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8788V/WA (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4350 mAh | 15080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink, Light Blue | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 390 EUR |
Cubot Hafury V1
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable for light usage
- Older, less efficient chipset
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower build quality
Blackview BV9300
- More powerful and efficient Helio G99 chipset
- Faster 33W charging with reverse charging
- Likely better display and camera
- Higher price compared to the Hafury V1
- May still lack flagship-level performance
- Rugged design may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the BV9300’s positioning, it’s likely to feature a higher-quality panel with better color accuracy and potentially a higher refresh rate. The Hafury V1, targeting a lower price point, likely utilizes a more basic LCD panel. Bezels are also likely to be more pronounced on the Hafury V1 to reduce manufacturing costs.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a detailed comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume the Blackview BV9300, being the more premium device, will feature a larger main sensor and potentially more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the BV9300 is also more probable, leading to sharper images and smoother video recording, especially in low-light conditions. The Hafury V1 likely relies on software-based image enhancement, which may not yield the same results. Any 2MP macro lenses on either device should be considered marketing features rather than significant photographic tools.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BV9300’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a significant advantage over the Cubot Hafury V1’s Mediatek MT8788V (12nm). The 6nm process node of the G99 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Cortex-A76 cores in the G99 deliver substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for app responsiveness and gaming. The Hafury V1’s Cortex-A73 cores are older and less efficient. The G99’s integrated GPU will also provide a superior gaming experience.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging speeds reveal a key difference. The Blackview BV9300’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the Cubot Hafury V1’s 18W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. The BV9300 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices – a feature absent on the Hafury V1. Even if the Hafury V1 had a slightly larger battery capacity, the slower charging speed would likely negate that advantage for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot Hafury V1 if you need a functional, basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are prioritizing the lowest possible price. Buy the Blackview BV9300 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content consumption, and value faster charging speeds to minimize interruptions. The BV9300 is also the better choice for users who might benefit from reverse wired charging.