The rugged smartphone market offers durability, but often at a performance cost. We pit the Doogee S89 Pro, a known quantity with a Mediatek Helio P90, against the Cubot C5, a device shrouded in specification ambiguity. This comparison aims to determine if the C5’s unknown factors can challenge the S89 Pro’s established features.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a known performance profile and fast charging, the Doogee S89 Pro is the clear winner. Its Helio P90 chipset and 65W charging provide a tangible advantage. The Cubot C5’s lack of published specifications makes a confident recommendation impossible.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | No | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2022, August 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 43 x 43 x 10 mm (1.69 x 1.69 x 0.39 in) | 172 x 86 x 19.4 mm (6.77 x 3.39 x 0.76 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 400 g (14.11 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 240 x 280 pixels (~217 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.7 inches | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~65.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.1 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Proprietary OS | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 16MB | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 130˚, (ultrawide)
20 MP, f/1.8, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | - | 1440p, 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | - | 1080p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | No | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 65W wired |
| Type | 260 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Pink | Black, Orange |
| Price | - | About 370 EUR |
Cubot C5
- Potential for lower price (speculative)
- Rugged design (assumed, based on brand)
- Unknown features could be surprisingly good
- Completely unknown specifications
- Potential for limited software support
- Uncertain performance and battery life
Doogee S89 Pro
- Proven Mediatek Helio P90 performance
- 65W fast charging
- Established brand reputation
- May be more expensive than the Cubot C5
- Rugged design may add bulk
- Mid-range chipset may not satisfy demanding users
Display Comparison
Without specifications for the Cubot C5’s display, a direct comparison is impossible. The Doogee S89 Pro, typical of its segment, likely features an IPS LCD panel. Display quality will hinge on factors like peak brightness and color calibration, which are currently unknown for both devices. The absence of information regarding the C5’s resolution or refresh rate further complicates any assessment. Users prioritizing visual fidelity will need to await C5 specifications.
Camera Comparison
The camera capabilities of the Cubot C5 are completely unknown. The Doogee S89 Pro’s camera setup, while not detailed in the provided data, likely features a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones may include one, but their utility is limited. Users focused on photography should await detailed camera reviews of the Cubot C5.
Performance
The Doogee S89 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P90 (12nm) is the defining performance factor in this comparison. Its octa-core configuration – 2x2.1 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a solid mid-range experience. The 12nm process node, while not cutting-edge, offers a reasonable balance between performance and power efficiency. The Cubot C5’s chipset is entirely unknown, making any performance prediction speculative. Given the price bracket, it’s likely to be a less powerful MediaTek or Unisoc chip, potentially impacting multitasking and gaming performance. The P90’s Cortex-A75 cores will provide a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Doogee S89 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a significant advantage. This allows for rapid replenishment, minimizing downtime. While the battery capacity of the S89 Pro is not specified, 65W charging suggests a focus on quick top-ups. The Cubot C5’s battery capacity and charging speed are unknown. A larger battery capacity on the C5 wouldn’t necessarily translate to longer battery life if paired with a less efficient chipset. The P90’s power efficiency, combined with 65W charging, gives the S89 Pro a clear edge in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot C5 if you are a risk-taker willing to gamble on an unknown quantity, potentially seeking a lower price point and are comfortable with potentially limited software support. Buy the Doogee S89 Pro if you need a dependable, rugged device with a proven chipset, fast charging, and a more established brand reputation, even if it means paying a premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Given the lack of information on the Cubot C5, is it worth considering over the Doogee S89 Pro?
Unless you are a very budget-conscious user willing to accept significant uncertainty, the Doogee S89 Pro is the safer choice. Its Helio P90 chipset and 65W charging offer a guaranteed level of performance and convenience that the Cubot C5 cannot currently promise.
❓ How does the Mediatek Helio P90 in the Doogee S89 Pro handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P90 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, prolonged gaming sessions may lead to some thermal throttling, reducing performance over time. It's not a flagship gaming chip, but it provides a playable experience for casual gamers.
❓ Is the 65W charging on the Doogee S89 Pro likely to degrade the battery health quickly?
While fast charging can theoretically contribute to battery degradation over the long term, modern smartphones employ battery management systems to mitigate this effect. 65W charging is unlikely to cause significant issues within the typical 2-3 year lifespan of the device, and the convenience of rapid charging often outweighs the potential for minor degradation.
