Poco X4 Pro 5G vs Cubot C30: A Detailed Comparison of Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its more modern 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset offers significantly better performance and efficiency than the Cubot C30’s older 12nm Helio P60, coupled with the convenience of 67W fast charging. While the C30 offers a lower entry price, the X4 Pro provides a more future-proof and enjoyable user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot C30 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 76.4 x 8.5 mm (6.19 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2310 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 101.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | - | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Cubot C30
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent battery endurance (119h).
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks.
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset limits performance.
- Charging speed is likely slow.
- Display specs are unknown, potentially lower quality.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Modern Snapdragon 695 offers better performance and efficiency.
- 67W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Higher price compared to the Cubot C30.
- Camera details are limited, but likely not flagship-level.
- Endurance rating is the same as the C30, despite more powerful components.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like resolution, peak brightness, and refresh rate are missing for the Cubot C30. The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from Xiaomi’s display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors and better viewing angles. Without specific data on the C30, it’s difficult to assess its display quality beyond basic functionality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. However, Xiaomi generally invests more in camera software and image processing. The Cubot C30, positioned as a budget device, likely utilizes a simpler camera system. While both may capture acceptable photos in good lighting, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is expected to perform better in low-light conditions and offer more advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Cubot C30’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The 6nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, meaning the X4 Pro 5G will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – offers a performance advantage over the Helio P60’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53, particularly in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. The X4 Pro 5G will deliver a noticeably smoother experience for demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC3 support) is a game-changer. It can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Cubot C30’s charging speed is not specified, but is likely significantly slower. This faster charging capability provides a substantial convenience advantage for the X4 Pro 5G, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot C30 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and don't require demanding performance for gaming or heavy multitasking. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value 5G connectivity, faster charging speeds, a more efficient processor for sustained performance, and a generally smoother user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.