Cubot C30 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance and a refined experience, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a significant performance leap over the Cubot C30’s Helio P60, translating to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming. While the C30 offers a lower price point, the A52s 5G’s superior processing power justifies the cost for most.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Cubot C30 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 157.1 x 76.4 x 8.5 mm (6.19 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2310 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 101.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", AF 16 MP, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | - | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Cubot C30
- Significantly lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Outdated Helio P60 chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Unknown display quality
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (800 nits)
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price compared to Cubot C30
- Battery life is comparable, not superior
- May be discontinued in some markets
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Cubot C30’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness ensures excellent visibility outdoors, a crucial advantage for everyday use. While the A52s 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting a typical AMOLED panel, the C30’s panel characteristics are unknown. The A52s 5G’s display technology likely offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles, enhancing the overall visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger sensor, though sensor size isn't specified. The Cubot C30’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on affordability over image quality. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison, but the A52s 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A52s 5G, a common feature in this price range, would further enhance image and video stability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Cubot C30’s MediaTek Helio P60 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G delivers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. Architecturally, the Snapdragon 778G features a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, alongside 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, offering a more modern and powerful configuration than the C30’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. This translates to a noticeable difference in app launch speeds, multitasking responsiveness, and gaming performance.
Battery Life
Both the Cubot C30 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior power efficiency could offset the potential difference in battery capacity (not specified for the C30). The A52s 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for faster replenishment compared to the C30’s likely slower charging speed. This faster charging capability provides a more convenient user experience, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot C30 if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You're willing to accept compromises in performance and camera quality to save money. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize a responsive user experience, capable camera system, and 5G connectivity, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more polished and future-proof device.