Cubot has carved a niche in the ultra-budget smartphone market, and the C29 and P60 represent two of their current offerings. While both aim to deliver affordability, they differ significantly in internal hardware. This comparison dives deep into the specifications, focusing on how the Mediatek Helio P35 in the P60 impacts real-world performance compared to the C29, which lacks detailed published specs, forcing us to analyze it within the context of its likely market positioning.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing basic functionality like calls, messaging, and light social media, the Cubot C29 likely offers sufficient performance at the lowest possible price. However, the Cubot P60, powered by the Mediatek Helio P35, is the clear winner for anyone needing smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, or a more responsive user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | N/A | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | No | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Zinc alloy/ Stainless steel frame, titanium bezel | - |
| Dimensions | 51.9 x 49.5 x 13.4 mm (2.04 x 1.95 x 0.53 in) | 165 x 76.3 x 9 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 42.1 g (1.48 oz) | 198.6 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 360 x 360 pixels (~335 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.52 inches | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | - | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Proprietary OS | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128Mb | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm
0.3 MP |
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Video | - | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | No | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2, blood pressure | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 410 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Black, White |
Cubot C29
- Likely the most affordable option
- Simple and easy to use for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding hardware
- Poor performance for multitasking or gaming
- Limited camera capabilities
- Likely outdated software support
Cubot P60
- Improved performance with the Helio P35 chipset
- Better multitasking and app responsiveness
- Slightly better camera image processing
- Higher price point than the C29
- Battery life may be comparable to the C29
- Still limited by the Helio P35's age
Display Comparison
Without specific display details for the C29, we can assume it utilizes a standard IPS LCD panel common in this price bracket. The P60’s display specifications are also unavailable, but given the Helio P35 chipset, it’s unlikely to feature advanced technologies like high refresh rates or LTPO. Both devices likely prioritize screen size over resolution or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design. The absence of detailed specs makes a direct comparison impossible, but the P60’s chipset suggests a potentially slightly more capable display driver.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications for both devices are sparse. It’s reasonable to assume the C29 features a basic camera setup geared towards casual snapshots. The P60’s camera capabilities are similarly undefined, but the presence of a more powerful chipset suggests potentially better image processing capabilities. Both devices likely include a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is highly unlikely on either device. Image quality will be heavily reliant on software optimization, and users should expect limited performance in low-light conditions. The absence of detailed sensor information prevents a meaningful comparison beyond the expectation that the P60 will offer slightly better image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Cubot P60’s Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) is an octa-core processor featuring four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.35 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This architecture, while not cutting-edge, provides a noticeable performance boost over the likely entry-level chipsets found in the C29. The 12nm process node of the Helio P35 offers a degree of power efficiency, though it won’t rival more modern 4nm or 5nm chips. The P60 will handle app switching and basic games with greater fluidity. The C29, lacking a specified chipset, will likely struggle with demanding applications and multitasking, making it suitable only for the most basic use cases. The P60’s GPU, integrated within the Helio P35, will also provide a superior gaming experience, albeit limited to less graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
Battery capacity for both devices is unknown. However, the Helio P35 in the P60, while not exceptionally power-efficient, benefits from a 12nm process. This suggests the P60 might achieve comparable battery life to the C29, despite potentially driving a more demanding display and processing workload. Charging wattage is also unspecified for both models, indicating slow charging speeds are likely. Real-world battery performance will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the P60’s chipset offers a slight advantage in power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot C29 if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks and are on an extremely tight budget, prioritizing cost above all else. Buy the Cubot P60 if you prefer a more capable device that can handle moderate multitasking, streaming, and light gaming, and are willing to spend a bit more for improved performance and a more modern chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Cubot P60 be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Mediatek Helio P35 in the Cubot P60 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at low to medium settings with a lower frame rate. It's not designed for demanding gaming, and you may experience occasional lag or stuttering. The C29 is unlikely to provide a playable experience.
❓ How does the Helio P35 chipset in the P60 compare to more modern processors?
The Helio P35 is an older chipset, released in 2018. It's significantly less powerful than current-generation processors like the Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 700. While adequate for basic tasks, it will struggle with demanding applications and multitasking compared to newer devices.
❓ Is the camera on the Cubot P60 good enough for social media photos?
The P60’s camera will be sufficient for casual social media photos in good lighting conditions. However, expect limited detail and dynamic range, especially in low light. The C29’s camera will likely be even more limited in its capabilities.
❓ What kind of software updates can I expect on the Cubot P60?
Cubot’s software update track record is inconsistent. Expect limited updates, potentially only security patches. Major Android version updates are unlikely. The C29 will likely receive even less software support.
