The Cubot A10 and Ulefone Note 10P represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both rely on Unisoc chipsets, but employ different approaches to CPU core configuration and feature sets. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for budget-conscious users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Cubot A10 emerges as the stronger choice. Its octa-core Unisoc T606 processor provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Ulefone Note 10P’s quad-core Tiger T310, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications, despite the Ulefone's slightly slower clock speed on its single high-performance core.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20, 26, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June | 2022, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.6 x 75.5 x 10.4 mm (6.52 x 2.97 x 0.41 in) | 165.2 x 76.7 x 9.7 mm (6.50 x 3.02 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core (1x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T310 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 3GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 48 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple | Moonlight Black, Aurora Red, Emerald Green |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 110 EUR |
Cubot A10
- Octa-core processor offers superior multitasking.
- More responsive user experience for demanding apps.
- Potentially better sustained performance under load.
- Charging speed not specified, potentially slower than competitors.
- Display quality likely average for the price range.
Ulefone Note 10P
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful chipset.
- Simpler processor may result in lower heat generation.
- Lower price point (likely, based on market positioning).
- Quad-core processor struggles with multitasking.
- Slow 10W charging is a significant drawback.
- Limited performance for gaming or demanding applications.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the lack of display specifications in the provided data, we can assume both utilize standard LCD panels common in this price bracket. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will be moderate at best. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected. The user experience will be similar on both devices in terms of visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera systems geared towards casual photography. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both devices likely include one, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be similar, prioritizing scene recognition over nuanced detail. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on both is expected, meaning low-light performance will be heavily reliant on software algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the CPU configuration. The Cubot A10’s Unisoc T606 features an octa-core setup – two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores at the same speed for efficiency. This contrasts with the Ulefone Note 10P’s Unisoc Tiger T310, which employs a quad-core configuration: one Cortex-A75 at 2.0 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. While the Ulefone has a higher clock speed on its primary core, the A10’s additional cores will significantly improve multitasking and sustained performance. The T606’s architecture is better equipped to handle background processes without noticeable slowdowns. Both chipsets are built on a 12nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the A10’s architecture will likely be more efficient under load.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Note 10P’s 10W wired charging is a significant limitation. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the less demanding Unisoc Tiger T310 in the Ulefone *could* translate to slightly longer battery life. However, the Cubot A10’s more efficient octa-core architecture may mitigate this difference. The slow charging speed of the Ulefone will require significantly more time to reach a full charge, impacting usability for users who rely on quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Cubot A10 if you prioritize overall performance and responsiveness for everyday tasks and light gaming. Its octa-core CPU will handle multiple apps and moderate workloads more efficiently. Buy the Ulefone Note 10P if your primary concern is basic functionality – calls, texts, and light social media – and you value a potentially longer battery life due to the less power-hungry chipset, accepting a trade-off in processing speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Ulefone Note 10P struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Ulefone Note 10P can run these apps, its quad-core processor may exhibit noticeable lag when switching between them or when the apps are running in the background. The limited processing power can lead to a less fluid experience compared to devices with more cores.
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Cubot A10 capable of playing mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Unisoc T606 can handle PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect some occasional stuttering, especially during intense action sequences. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's capable of casual gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Ulefone Note 10P with its 10W charging?
With its 10W charging, the Ulefone Note 10P will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is a significant drawback compared to phones with faster charging capabilities, requiring overnight charging for optimal usability.
