Coolpad's X100 and Max represent different eras of smartphone design and capability. The Max, built around the older Snapdragon 617, aims for affordability, while the X100 leverages the more modern Helio G99 to deliver a noticeably improved user experience. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Coolpad X100 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Snapdragon 617 in the Max, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive overall experience. While the Max may be cheaper, the X100's performance justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 3, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 19 | 2016, June. Released 2016, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, February | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 169 x 76.3 x 8.6 mm (6.65 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 152 x 75.7 x 7.6 mm (5.98 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~72.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 405 |
| OS | Android 14, CoolOS | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, PDAF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.4µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Unspecified | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 2800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlit Black, Polar Silver, Palm Blue, Fairy Pink | Royal Gold, Rose Gold |
| Models | - | A8-831 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Coolpad X100
- Significantly faster processor for smooth performance
- More efficient chipset for better battery life
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially higher price point
- Specific display specs unknown
Coolpad Max
- Lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- May have longer battery life if it has a significantly larger capacity
- Outdated processor struggles with modern apps
- Inefficient chipset leads to poor battery life under load
- Slow charging speeds
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the Max's age, it likely features a 720p panel with relatively thick bezels. The X100, being a more recent release, likely boasts a 1080p display with slimmer bezels, offering a sharper and more immersive viewing experience. The X100's newer panel technology likely provides better color accuracy and viewing angles. Without specific data, it's reasonable to assume the X100 offers a superior visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. However, the age of the Max suggests its camera system will be significantly less capable than the X100's. While both phones likely feature a primary camera, the X100 benefits from newer image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The Snapdragon 617's ISP (Image Signal Processor) is older and less sophisticated, resulting in lower image quality, especially in low-light conditions. Any additional cameras on the Max are likely low-resolution sensors with limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is significant. The Coolpad X100's Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) utilizes Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the Coolpad Max's Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 (28nm), which features older Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.5 GHz and 1.0 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Helio G99 is far more efficient, resulting in better thermal management and sustained performance. The X100 will handle demanding apps and games with ease, while the Max will struggle with even moderate workloads. The G99's architecture is simply several generations ahead.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the X100's 33W wired charging is a major advantage. The Max likely supports slower charging speeds, meaning longer times to reach a full charge. While a larger battery capacity on the Max could offset the slower charging, the Helio G99's superior power efficiency in the X100 means it will likely deliver comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad X100 if you prioritize performance, responsiveness, and future-proofing. It's ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, frequently multitask, or simply want a phone that feels snappy and modern. Buy the Coolpad Max if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you are on an extremely tight budget where every dollar counts. Be prepared for noticeable slowdowns with demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Coolpad X100 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Helio G99 chipset in the X100 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty at medium to high settings. While it's not a flagship gaming phone, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 617 in the Max, which would struggle with these titles.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 617 in the Coolpad Max still adequate for basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing?
For very basic usage – making calls, sending texts, and light web browsing – the Snapdragon 617 is still functional. However, you will experience noticeable slowdowns when opening multiple apps or switching between them. It's not ideal for a smooth or responsive user experience.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Coolpad X100 compared to the Max?
The Coolpad X100's 33W charging is substantially faster than the Max's likely 10W or 15W charging. This translates to a significantly reduced charging time, allowing you to quickly top up your battery when needed. Expect a full charge on the X100 in around 1.5-2 hours, while the Max could take 3+ hours.
