The Coolpad Cool S and Nokia G100 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Coolpad leverages the older, but still capable, Mediatek Helio P60, while the Nokia opts for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, helping you determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and a smoother overall experience, the Nokia G100 is the better choice. While the Coolpad Cool S offers a similar CPU core count, the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process and Kryo architecture provide superior performance per watt, translating to better multitasking and sustained performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08. Released 2021, January 08 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 76.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 195.1 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0"
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.78", 0.9µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moon White, Lapis Blue, Night Black | Nordic Blue |
| Models | 2039 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 60 EUR |
Coolpad Cool S
- Potentially lower price point
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Octa-core CPU offers multitasking capability
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Slower 10W charging
- Likely to exhibit more thermal throttling
Nokia G100
- More efficient 11nm Snapdragon 662
- Faster 15W charging
- Smoother overall user experience
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer a significant camera upgrade
- Still a budget-focused device
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on the chipset, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of specifications like refresh rate or resolution suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for budget phones. The display is unlikely to be a deciding factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light conditions. Image processing will likely be the differentiating factor, with Nokia historically offering more natural-looking images, while Coolpad may lean towards more saturated results. We can expect both to include a standard macro lens of limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Coolpad Cool S’s Mediatek Helio P60 (12nm) features a combination of Cortex-A73 and A53 cores. While offering eight cores, the 12nm manufacturing process is less efficient than the Nokia G100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The Snapdragon 662 utilizes Qualcomm’s Kryo 260 Gold and Silver cores, designed for a balance of performance and power efficiency. This architectural advantage means the Snapdragon 662 will likely exhibit better sustained performance under load and less thermal throttling. The 11nm process node is a key advantage for the Nokia.
Battery Life
The Nokia G100’s 15W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Coolpad Cool S’s 10W charging. While neither is particularly fast by modern standards, the 5W difference translates to a noticeably quicker top-up time. The Snapdragon 662’s superior power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life on the Nokia G100, even if both phones have similar battery capacities (which is not specified in the data). The 11nm process allows the Nokia to sip power more efficiently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool S if you need a phone primarily for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and are extremely budget-constrained. Its Helio P60 chipset is sufficient for these workloads. Buy the Nokia G100 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, occasionally play mobile games, or value slightly faster charging and improved power efficiency, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P60 in the Coolpad Cool S struggle with modern app updates?
The Helio P60 is an older chipset. While it can handle most apps, newer, more demanding updates from popular apps like social media platforms or games may experience slowdowns or require more frequent clearing of background processes. The Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 is better equipped to handle these updates due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How much faster is the 15W charging on the Nokia G100 compared to the Coolpad Cool S’s 10W charging?
While the difference may not seem substantial, 15W charging will reduce the time to fully charge the Nokia G100 by approximately 30-40% compared to the Coolpad Cool S. This means a full charge could take around 2-2.5 hours on the Nokia versus 3-4 hours on the Coolpad, depending on battery capacity.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 capable of playing popular mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 662 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth and consistent frame rate. The Helio P60 in the Coolpad Cool S will likely struggle to maintain a playable frame rate even on the lowest settings.
