The Coolpad Cool S and BLU G50 Plus represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing responsiveness and the ability to handle moderately demanding apps, the Coolpad Cool S emerges as the better choice. Its MediaTek Helio P60 chipset, featuring Cortex-A73 cores, provides a substantial performance advantage over the BLU G50 Plus’s Cortex-A55 based CPU, despite both phones sharing the same 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17, 28 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08. Released 2021, January 08 | 2020, September 22. Released 2020, September 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 76.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 158.7 x 76 x 9.1 mm (6.25 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~79.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.78", 0.9µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moon White, Lapis Blue, Night Black | Black, Blue, Red, Green |
| Models | 2039 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 90 EUR |
Coolpad Cool S
- Significantly more powerful processor (Helio P60)
- Cortex-A73 cores offer better responsiveness
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 12nm process
- Limited information on display quality
- 10W charging is slow
BLU G50 Plus
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Adequate for basic communication tasks
- Significantly weaker processor (Cortex-A55 only)
- Slower app launch times and multitasking
- Likely lower performance in demanding apps
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for either device. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolutions. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or panel technology suggests neither phone will offer a particularly visually impressive experience. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras in this price segment suggests both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with 2MP macro or depth sensors of limited utility. Image processing capabilities will likely be basic on both devices, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance image quality. The Coolpad Cool S *may* have a slight edge due to the more powerful ISP within the Helio P60 chipset, potentially enabling faster image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Coolpad Cool S’s MediaTek Helio P60 (MT6771), built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores, also at 2.0 GHz. This architecture provides a significant performance boost compared to the BLU G50 Plus’s octa-core CPU clocked at 1.6 GHz, comprised entirely of Cortex-A55 cores. The Cortex-A73 cores in the Helio P60 offer substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 12nm manufacturing process also contributes to better power efficiency compared to the likely larger node used in the G50 Plus, though the exact process node for the BLU device is unknown. This translates to a smoother user experience on the Coolpad Cool S, especially when multitasking or running demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the Coolpad Cool S and BLU G50 Plus support 10W wired charging. Without knowing the battery capacity of either device, it’s difficult to estimate 0-100% charge times. However, the more efficient Helio P60 in the Coolpad Cool S *could* translate to slightly better battery life under similar usage conditions, offsetting any potential capacity differences. The 10W charging speed is relatively slow on both devices, requiring several hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool S if you need a phone capable of smoother multitasking, running more complex apps, or enjoying a slightly better gaming experience. Its Helio P60 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift. Buy the BLU G50 Plus if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize simplicity and potentially a lower initial cost, accepting a slower overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Coolpad Cool S handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Helio P60 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it *can* run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty at lower settings. Expect frame rate drops during intense action and don't anticipate a high-fidelity gaming experience. The BLU G50 Plus will struggle significantly with these titles.
❓ Is the difference in processor speed noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Coolpad Cool S’s Cortex-A73 cores will result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience when browsing the web or using social media apps. The BLU G50 Plus will feel comparatively sluggish.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond the 10W standard?
No, both the Coolpad Cool S and BLU G50 Plus are limited to 10W wired charging. This is a common limitation in this price segment, and users should expect several hours to fully charge the device.
