The smartphone market offers a dizzying array of choices, particularly in the budget and mid-range segments. The Coolpad Cool 6 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent two distinct approaches: the Cool 6 prioritizes affordability, while the Poco X3 Pro aims to deliver near-flagship performance at a competitive price. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Coolpad Cool 6 offers a lower price point, the performance gap is substantial enough to justify the extra investment for those prioritizing speed and responsiveness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 15. Released 2020, October 15 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 76.5 x 9.2 mm (6.39 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771T Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 21 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Coolpad Cool 6
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable battery life (112h endurance)
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro
- Outdated chipset (Helio P70)
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset for excellent performance
- Fast 33W wired charging
- 120Hz display for smoother visuals
- Higher price compared to the Coolpad Cool 6
- Battery life is comparable, not superior, to the Cool 6
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing for the Coolpad Cool 6. The Poco X3 Pro, while lacking information on peak brightness, benefits from a 120Hz refresh rate (not specified for the Cool 6), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. This is a significant advantage for gamers and those who consume a lot of video content. Without further data on the Cool 6's panel, the Poco X3 Pro holds a clear edge in display quality based on refresh rate alone.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it’s reasonable to assume it benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. The Cool 6 likely relies on more basic image processing, resulting in lower-quality photos, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of details makes it difficult to assess the quality of either camera system definitively, but the Poco X3 Pro’s overall hardware advantage suggests a superior camera experience.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference between these two phones. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Coolpad Cool 6’s MediaTek Helio P70 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860 features a Kryo 485 Gold core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional Gold cores and four Silver cores, offering a more complex and efficient architecture than the Helio P70’s simpler octa-core configuration. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Cool 6’s Helio P70 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and applications. This translates to a noticeably slower and less responsive experience on the Coolpad Cool 6.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro features 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes. Charging speed data is unavailable for the Coolpad Cool 6. This faster charging capability is a significant convenience factor for the Poco X3 Pro, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. While both phones offer similar endurance, the Poco X3 Pro’s charging speed provides a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 6 if you need a basic smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll appreciate its affordability and acceptable battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming, multitasking, and a smoother overall user experience. The Snapdragon 860 delivers a level of performance the Cool 6 simply cannot match, making it a better long-term investment for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro run demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro is capable of running Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship devices, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Coolpad Cool 6.
❓ Is the Coolpad Cool 6 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and basic messaging?
Absolutely. The Coolpad Cool 6 is a perfectly adequate device for basic communication and light usage. Its affordability makes it a good choice for users who don't require advanced features or high performance.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support 5G connectivity?
No, the Poco X3 Pro does not support 5G connectivity. It is a 4G LTE device. This is a trade-off to keep the price competitive, but it may be a consideration for users in areas with 5G coverage.
❓ How does the Helio P70 in the Coolpad Cool 6 handle multitasking?
The Helio P70 can handle basic multitasking, such as switching between a few apps. However, it will struggle with running multiple demanding applications simultaneously, leading to slowdowns and lag.
