The Coolpad Cool 5 and Samsung Galaxy J6+ represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they differ significantly in their internal hardware, particularly in their chipsets. This comparison will dissect those differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance and efficiency.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking the best performance in this price bracket, the Coolpad Cool 5 emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Helio P22 chipset, built on a 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy J6+'s older, 28nm Snapdragon 425, despite having a lower clock speed. While both phones offer a basic experience, the Cool 5 handles multitasking and app loading with greater fluidity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2018, September. Released 2018, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 76 x 8 mm (6.18 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 76.9 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 3.03 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 145 g (5.11 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1480 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 91.4 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 8.1 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
2 MP | 13 MP, f/1.9, 28mm (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/1.9 |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gradient Blue, Midnight Blue | Black, Gray, Red, Blue |
| Models | - | SM-J610F, SM-J610F, SM-J610G, SM-J610FN |
| Price | About 8000 INR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.31 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) |
Coolpad Cool 5
- More powerful and efficient Mediatek Helio P22 chipset
- Octa-core CPU for better multitasking
- 12nm process for improved battery life and reduced heat
- Brand recognition is lower than Samsung
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy J6+
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially more refined software experience
- Larger display size (6.0 inches)
- Less powerful and efficient Snapdragon 425 chipset
- 28nm process leads to higher power consumption
- Quad-core CPU limits multitasking capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price range. However, detailed specs like resolution and brightness are missing. The J6+’s larger 6.0-inch display (versus the Cool 5’s 5.99-inch) may offer a slightly more immersive viewing experience, but without knowing the panel quality, it’s difficult to assess. The absence of information on PWM dimming rates prevents a judgment on eye strain for sensitive users.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones featuring basic camera setups. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both devices likely include a primary camera and a depth sensor. The J6+ may have a slight edge in software processing due to Samsung’s image processing algorithms, but the Cool 5’s more powerful chipset could potentially handle more complex image processing tasks. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras (often 2MP) on both devices suggests limited utility beyond basic depth sensing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Coolpad Cool 5’s Mediatek Helio P22 (MT6762) is fabricated on a 12nm process, offering significantly improved power efficiency compared to the Samsung Galaxy J6+'s Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) built on a 28nm process. While the Snapdragon 425 has a quad-core configuration, the Helio P22 utilizes an octa-core setup (2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 vs 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53). This translates to better multitasking and responsiveness on the Cool 5. The 12nm process also means less heat generation under load, potentially reducing thermal throttling during prolonged use. The Cool 5 will demonstrably outperform the J6+ in CPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not provided for either device. However, the Coolpad Cool 5’s more efficient 12nm chipset will likely result in better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity than the J6+. The Snapdragon 425’s 28nm process is inherently less power-efficient. Both phones offer wired charging, but specific wattage details are unavailable. The Cool 5’s chipset efficiency will likely translate to faster overall charging times, even with similar wattage ratings.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 5 if you need a phone capable of handling more demanding tasks like light gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its more modern chipset provides a smoother user experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy J6+ if you prioritize brand recognition and a potentially more refined software experience, understanding that you'll be sacrificing performance for that familiarity. The J6+ is best suited for very basic usage – calls, texts, and light social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Coolpad Cool 5 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
No, the Coolpad Cool 5’s Helio P22 chipset is more than capable of handling everyday apps like WhatsApp and Facebook. The octa-core CPU and improved efficiency will provide a smoother experience compared to the Snapdragon 425 in the J6+, even with multiple apps open.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 425 in the Samsung Galaxy J6+ sufficient for basic web browsing and calls?
Yes, the Snapdragon 425 is adequate for very basic tasks like web browsing and making calls. However, expect slower loading times and potential lag when switching between apps. It’s best suited for users with minimal smartphone needs.
❓ Can either of these phones handle mobile gaming?
Neither phone is ideal for serious mobile gaming. The Coolpad Cool 5 will offer a slightly better experience due to its more powerful chipset, but expect to play games on low settings with limited frame rates. The Snapdragon 425 in the J6+ will struggle with most modern games.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Samsung generally provides more consistent software updates than Coolpad, although both are budget devices and long-term support cannot be guaranteed. Expect the J6+ to receive security patches for a longer period, but major Android version updates are unlikely for either device.
