The Coolpad Cool 5 and Motorola Moto G67 Power represent different approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Cool 5, likely an older model, focuses on affordability, while the G67 Power aims to deliver a more modern experience with a newer chipset and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Motorola Moto G67 Power is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Coolpad Cool 5’s Helio P22, coupled with significantly faster 30W charging. While the Cool 5 may be cheaper, the G67 Power provides a far more future-proof and enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, October | 2025, November 05 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, November 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 157 x 76 x 8 mm (6.18 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 145 g (5.11 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 15, planned upgrade to Android 16 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, AF
2 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gradient Blue, Midnight Blue | Pantone: Cilantro, Parachute Purple, Blue Curacao |
| Price | About 8000 INR | ₹ 15,734 |
Coolpad Cool 5
- Likely the most affordable option
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Outdated chipset with limited performance
- Slow charging (likely)
- Poor gaming performance
Motorola Moto G67 Power
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor
- 30W fast charging
- Improved power efficiency
- Potentially higher price point
- May not have expandable storage
- Camera performance is good, but not flagship-level
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the Coolpad Cool 5, it's reasonable to assume it features a lower-resolution panel compared to the Moto G67 Power. The G67 Power’s display benefits from the more efficient chipset, potentially allowing for a higher refresh rate (though not specified). The key difference lies in the underlying processing power to drive a more visually demanding display. The G67 Power’s chipset can handle more complex graphics rendering, resulting in smoother animations and a more responsive user interface.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Coolpad Cool 5, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its market positioning, it likely features a simpler camera system. The Moto G67 Power, while not a camera flagship, benefits from the image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, enabling better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. The G67 Power’s ISP can handle more complex algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range optimization, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Motorola Moto G67 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, is a significant upgrade over the Coolpad Cool 5’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm). The 4nm node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, allowing the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 to sustain peak performance for longer periods. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s CPU configuration – featuring four Cortex-A78 cores – provides a noticeable boost in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Cool 5’s all-Cortex-A53 setup. This difference will be most apparent in demanding applications like games and video editing.
Battery Life
The Coolpad Cool 5 offers wired charging, but its wattage is unspecified. The Motorola Moto G67 Power’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage, significantly reducing charging times compared to the Cool 5. While battery capacity isn’t provided for the Cool 5, the G67 Power’s efficiency, thanks to the 4nm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, allows it to deliver all-day battery life even with moderate to heavy usage. The faster charging also minimizes downtime, ensuring you can quickly top up the battery when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 5 if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and your usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It's a viable option for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device. Buy the Motorola Moto G67 Power if you prioritize performance, faster charging, and a smoother overall experience. It’s ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, streaming video, or multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G67 Power handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process helps prevent overheating and throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a consistently smooth experience.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P22 and Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 noticeable for everyday tasks?
Absolutely. While both phones can handle basic tasks like browsing and social media, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a much more responsive and fluid experience. App loading times will be faster, multitasking will be smoother, and the overall user interface will feel more polished.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G67 Power with the 30W charger?
The Motorola Moto G67 Power can typically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes with the included 30W charger. This is a significant improvement over the likely slower charging speeds of the Coolpad Cool 5.
