The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Coolpad Cool 20+ and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G are two contenders vying for your attention. While both offer 5G connectivity, they diverge significantly in chipset choice and charging capabilities, creating a clear distinction in performance and user experience. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Coolpad’s Helio G85. Crucially, the 67W fast charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing downtime compared to the Coolpad’s slow 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE (2CA) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.1 g (6.95 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC3 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, CoolOS 2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF
0.3 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Coolpad Cool 20+
- Most affordable option
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Slow 10W charging
- Less powerful Helio G85 chipset
- Limited gaming performance
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- 67W fast charging (PD3.0, QC3)
- More efficient 6nm process
- Slightly higher price point
- Display specs lack detail
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the Coolpad Cool 20+. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, while also lacking detailed specs, benefits from Xiaomi’s generally strong display calibration. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, but without specific measurements, it's difficult to definitively say.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. The omission of details suggests neither phone is a photography powerhouse. The Coolpad Cool 20+ likely relies on software processing to enhance image quality, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G may benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP). Without further information, it’s safe to assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing gimmick with limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process than the Coolpad Cool 20+'s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). This translates to better power efficiency and sustained performance. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a slight clock speed advantage over the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s 6nm process minimizes heat, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Coolpad will likely struggle with demanding titles at higher settings.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The Coolpad Cool 20+ is limited to a slow 10W wired charge, requiring significant time to fully replenish the battery. In contrast, the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving 70% charge in just 22 minutes and a full charge in 41 minutes. This rapid charging capability is a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 20+ if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on performance and charging speed. It’s a functional device for basic tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and especially if you need quick charging to keep you powered throughout the day. The X4 Pro is the better all-rounder for the majority of users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, Genshin Impact will likely require reduced graphics settings and frame rate caps to maintain a smooth experience. Expect playable performance at medium settings, but don't anticipate a flagship-level gaming experience.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the Coolpad Cool 20+ from 0%?
With only 10W charging, a full charge from 0% on the Coolpad Cool 20+ will likely take over 3 hours, potentially closer to 4. This is a significant drawback compared to the Poco X4 Pro 5G's 41-minute full charge time.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
The Snapdragon 695 5G does support carrier aggregation, which can significantly improve 5G download and upload speeds in areas with good network coverage. However, the specific bands supported will vary depending on the region and carrier.
❓ What type of USB port do both phones use?
Both phones utilize a USB-C port for charging and data transfer. This is standard for modern smartphones and ensures compatibility with a wide range of accessories.
