The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and Coolpad Cool 20 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The A52s 5G, leveraging Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 778G, aims for a balance of performance and features, while the Cool 20, powered by MediaTek’s Helio G80, focuses on affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly better performance, and its 800 nits peak brightness provides a more usable outdoor experience. While the Coolpad Cool 20 offers a lower price point, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 26. Released 2021, June 01 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.6 g (7.05 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, CoolOS 2 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8 (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 90 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Coolpad Cool 20
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (800 nits)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Higher price point
- May have bloatware
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More affordable price
- Potentially longer battery life (due to lower power chipset)
- Lightweight design (likely)
- Substantially slower performance (Helio G80)
- Lower display quality
- Slower charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Coolpad Cool 20’s unspecified brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s Super AMOLED panel likely offers superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The Cool 20’s panel type is not specified, suggesting a potentially lower-quality LCD.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s superior image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor. While both may have multiple lenses, the Cool 20’s inclusion of a 2MP macro lens is unlikely to provide meaningful image quality improvements. The Snapdragon 778G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling features like better low-light performance and faster image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Coolpad Cool 20’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – versus the Cool 20’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. This translates to approximately 40-50% faster CPU performance and a significantly more capable GPU for gaming. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Coolpad Cool 20’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G supports 25W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster charging speeds compared to the Cool 20’s likely slower charging rate. This means less downtime and quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 20 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and don't require demanding gaming or extensive multitasking. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value smoother performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Coolpad Cool 20 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio G80 is a budget-oriented chipset and will likely struggle to run demanding games at high settings. Expect lower frame rates and potential stuttering, even on medium settings. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, with its Snapdragon 778G, offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is relatively efficient, and the A52s 5G includes thermal management features. While some warming is expected during extended gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling like you might with less efficient chipsets. The 6nm process node helps keep temperatures under control.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Coolpad Cool 20 worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras offer limited image quality. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in blurry and often unusable photos. It's unlikely to provide a significant improvement over using the main camera in close-up mode.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G with the 25W charger?
With the included 25W charger, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G can typically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes. This is considerably faster than the Coolpad Cool 20, which likely supports a slower charging standard.