The smartphone market is flooded with options, but finding the right balance of performance and price can be challenging. We pit the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT, boasting a powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset and rapid 67W charging, against the Coolpad Cool 10, a more budget-focused device with varying chipset options depending on the region. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the clear winner. Its significantly more powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1100 processor, coupled with 67W fast charging, provides a superior experience for gaming and everyday use. While the Coolpad Cool 10 offers a lower entry price, the performance gap is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 12 | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.65 GHz Cortex A53) - ChinaOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) - International | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6758 Helio P30 (16 nm) - ChinaMediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) - International | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSD | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.5, PDAF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glazed Black, Seashell White, Science Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | SEA-A0 | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9)
GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Coolpad Cool 10
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent battery endurance (110h).
- Available in multiple regional variants.
- Significantly weaker processor performance.
- Charging speed is likely slow.
- Limited camera information suggests a basic system.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1100 processor.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (0-100% in 42 mins).
- Higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility.
- Higher price compared to the Coolpad Cool 10.
- Camera details are limited.
- May be overkill for basic smartphone users.
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a contrast ratio of 1425:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Poco X3 GT boasts a measured peak brightness of 537 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Coolpad Cool 10, whose brightness is not specified. The lack of information regarding panel technology (IPS, AMOLED) for the Coolpad Cool 10 makes a direct comparison difficult, but the X3 GT’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume the Poco X3 GT, being a more recent and higher-tier device, likely features a more capable camera system, but this remains speculative without further information. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference between these two phones. The Poco X3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, offering a substantial leap in CPU performance over the Coolpad Cool 10’s options. The Cool 10’s China variant uses the Helio P30 (16nm), while the international version has the Helio P60 (12nm). The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm process also provides superior power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X3 GT’s CPU architecture (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is significantly more modern and capable than either of the Cool 10’s configurations (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.65 GHz Cortex A53 or 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53).
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 GT’s 67W wired charging with PD3.0 support is a game-changer, allowing a full charge in just 42 minutes. The Coolpad Cool 10’s charging speed is not specified, implying a significantly slower charging time. This difference in charging speed dramatically improves the user experience, especially for those who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 10 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and your usage primarily revolves around calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT if you demand a smoother, more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and value fast charging capabilities. The X3 GT is for users who want a phone that can keep up with their digital lives without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X3 GT's Dimensity 1100 chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100 is a relatively efficient chipset, and the Poco X3 GT incorporates thermal management solutions. While some heat is inevitable during intensive gaming, the 6nm process and cooling system help mitigate throttling, providing a consistently smooth experience for extended periods.
❓ Is the Coolpad Cool 10 a good option for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and basic apps?
Yes, the Coolpad Cool 10 is a viable option for users with basic needs. Its lower price point makes it an attractive choice if you primarily use your phone for calls, messaging, and light social media. However, be prepared for slower performance and potentially longer charging times.
❓ What type of charging port does the Poco X3 GT use?
The Poco X3 GT uses a USB-C port, supporting 67W wired charging and PD3.0 protocol. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of chargers and accessories.
❓ Which phone is better for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Poco X3 GT is significantly better suited for PUBG Mobile. The Dimensity 1100 chipset provides the processing power needed for higher frame rates and smoother gameplay, while the Coolpad Cool 10’s Helio P30 or P60 will likely struggle to maintain consistent performance.
