The Coolpad Cool 10 and vivo Y53s 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their respective MediaTek Helio chipsets. This comparison dives deep into these differences, analyzing performance, battery life, and camera capabilities to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the vivo Y53s 4G emerges as the better choice. Its Helio G80 chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Coolpad Cool 10’s Helio P60 (or P30 in some regions), and the 33W charging is a significant convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 12 | 2021, July 09 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, July 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 164 x 75.5 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.65 GHz Cortex A53) - ChinaOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) - International | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6758 Helio P30 (16 nm) - ChinaMediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) - International | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSD | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.5, PDAF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glazed Black, Seashell White, Science Blue | Blue Purple, Black Green |
| Models | SEA-A0 | - |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Coolpad Cool 10
- Potentially lower price point
- Regional availability may be wider
- Helio P60 variant (International) offers a slight performance boost over P30
- Older chipset (Helio P30/P60)
- Slower charging speeds
- Less efficient processor architecture
vivo Y53s 4G
- More powerful Helio G80 chipset
- Faster 33W wired charging
- More efficient 12nm process
- Potentially higher price
- May have limited regional availability
- Display specifications are likely similar to Coolpad Cool 10
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Specifications are not provided for either display, so we must rely on market positioning. Given the price bracket, both likely feature 720p+ LCD panels. The vivo Y53s 4G, being a slightly newer device, *may* benefit from minor improvements in color accuracy or brightness, but these are unlikely to be substantial. Bezels are expected to be relatively thick on both models, typical for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information. However, both phones likely feature a primary sensor paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility. The focus should be on the main sensor’s megapixel count and aperture. Without this data, it’s reasonable to assume the vivo Y53s 4G, as a newer device, *may* have a slightly more advanced image processing pipeline, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a 33W charging solution suggests a slightly higher overall investment in the Y53s 4G, which could extend to the camera module.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y53s 4G’s MediaTek Helio G80 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the Coolpad Cool 10’s options. The G80 utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A75 cores alongside A55s – compared to the Cool 10’s Cortex-A53 (P30) or A73/A53 (P60) combination. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 12nm process of the G80 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under sustained load. The Cool 10’s P60 variant (international) offers a slight advantage over the P30 (China) due to the more powerful Cortex-A73 cores, but still falls behind the G80.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the vivo Y53s 4G’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage. This allows for a much faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Coolpad Cool 10, which likely supports standard 10W or 18W charging. Even if the Cool 10 has a slightly larger battery capacity, the convenience of rapid charging offered by the Y53s 4G is a compelling benefit for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 10 if you prioritize regional availability and potentially lower cost, and your usage is primarily focused on basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the vivo Y53s 4G if you value smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G80 in the vivo Y53s 4G offer a noticeable improvement for gaming compared to the Helio P60 in the Coolpad Cool 10?
Yes, the Helio G80 provides a tangible gaming advantage. Its Cortex-A75 cores and improved GPU architecture deliver higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in demanding titles. While neither phone is a dedicated gaming device, the Y53s 4G will handle games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with greater consistency.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the vivo Y53s 4G with the 33W charger compared to the Coolpad Cool 10?
The vivo Y53s 4G can charge from 0-100% in approximately 60-70 minutes with the 33W charger. The Coolpad Cool 10, likely supporting 10W or 18W charging, will take significantly longer – potentially 2.5 to 4 hours for a full charge.
❓ Which phone is better suited for running multiple apps simultaneously?
The vivo Y53s 4G is better equipped for multitasking. The Helio G80’s more efficient CPU architecture and potentially larger RAM capacity (specifications not provided, but likely similar or higher) allow it to handle multiple apps running in the background without significant slowdown.
