The Coolpad Cool 10 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Cool 10, available in different chipset configurations depending on region, aims for affordability. The Moto G9 Plus, however, prioritizes a more robust chipset and faster charging, positioning itself as a slightly more premium option within the same price bracket.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G chipset delivers significantly better performance than either the Helio P30 or P60 variants of the Coolpad Cool 10, translating to smoother multitasking and a more enjoyable gaming experience. While battery life is comparable, the G9 Plus’s 30W charging is a clear advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 12 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.52 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.8 g (7.16 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.65 GHz Cortex A53) - ChinaOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) - International | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6758 Helio P30 (16 nm) - ChinaMediatek MT6771 Helio P60 (12 nm) - International | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSD | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.5, PDAF
0.3 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glazed Black, Seashell White, Science Blue | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | SEA-A0 | XT2087-1 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Coolpad Cool 10
- Potentially lower price point
- Regional availability (depending on variant)
- Acceptable battery life
- Significantly weaker performance (Helio P30 variant)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio P30 variant)
- Slower charging speed (unspecified)
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 730G
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery life to Coolpad Cool 10
- May not be available in all regions
Display Comparison
Both the Coolpad Cool 10 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus feature displays with a 1356:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual characteristics in terms of black levels and color depth. The Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits, which is a tangible advantage over any unmeasured brightness of the Cool 10, making it more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While neither phone specifies panel technology, the G9 Plus’s higher brightness suggests a potentially more advanced panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture information for the Coolpad Cool 10, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The Moto G9 Plus likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 730G, which provides better image processing and noise reduction. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the G9 Plus, if equipped, would further enhance low-light photography and video stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8nm) is a far more capable chipset than either the Mediatek MT6758 Helio P30 (16nm) or MT6771 Helio P60 (12nm) found in the Coolpad Cool 10. The Snapdragon 730G utilizes a Kryo 470 CPU architecture with a combination of performance (Gold) and efficiency (Silver) cores, offering a more balanced and powerful experience. The Helio P30’s older Cortex-A53 cores are less efficient and deliver lower performance. Even the Helio P60, while an improvement, is still outmatched by the Snapdragon 730G’s superior architecture and fabrication process. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Moto G9 Plus.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus features 30W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Coolpad Cool 10’s unspecified charging speed. This means the G9 Plus can be charged from 0-100% much faster, reducing downtime and providing greater convenience. While the Cool 10 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the G9 Plus’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Coolpad Cool 10 if you prioritize regional availability and are on an extremely tight budget, and happen to receive the Helio P60 variant. It's a functional device for basic tasks. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you value performance, faster charging, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a little more. It’s the better option for gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus is significantly better suited for gaming. The Snapdragon 730G’s more powerful GPU and CPU will deliver higher frame rates and smoother gameplay compared to the Helio P30 or P60 in the Coolpad Cool 10. Expect a more consistent and enjoyable gaming experience on the G9 Plus.
❓ Does the Coolpad Cool 10’s Helio P30 chipset suffer from significant throttling under sustained load?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio P30, built on a 16nm process, is prone to throttling under prolonged heavy use. This means performance will decrease over time as the chip heats up, leading to stuttering and lag during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. The Moto G9 Plus’s Snapdragon 730G, with its 8nm process, is more efficient and less susceptible to throttling.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Plus with the 30W charger?
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus can be fully charged from 0% to 100% in approximately 65-75 minutes using the included 30W charger. This is considerably faster than the Coolpad Cool 10, which lacks fast charging capabilities and will take significantly longer to reach a full charge.
❓ Is the camera on the Moto G9 Plus good enough for casual photography and social media?
Yes, the Moto G9 Plus’s camera is well-suited for casual photography and social media sharing. While not a flagship-level camera, the Qualcomm ISP and potential OIS contribute to good image quality in most lighting conditions. The camera is capable of capturing detailed photos and videos for everyday use.
