In a market dominated by smartphones, the feature phone continues to thrive, offering essential communication at an incredibly affordable price. We pit the Celkon C67+ against the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition, two contenders vying for the attention of users prioritizing call quality, battery life, and basic functionality over advanced features. Given the limited publicly available specifications, this comparison will focus on brand reputation and typical feature phone characteristics.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a reliable and long-lasting feature phone with 4G connectivity, the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition is the stronger choice. Nokia’s established reputation for build quality and software stability, even in basic phones, provides a more predictable user experience than the relatively unknown Celkon C67+.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, August. Released 2013, August | 2024, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2024, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 121.5 x 50 x 14.4 mm (4.78 x 1.97 x 0.57 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 93 g (3.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~111 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 | 1.8 inches, 10.0 cm2 (~16.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | IPS LCD |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 entries | Yes |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | microSDHC |
| Internal | - | 48MB 128MB RAM |
| Phonebook | 300 contacts | Yes |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Single | VGA | - |
| Video | Yes | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio |
| USB | Proprietary | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | Yes |
| Java | No | No |
| Messaging | SMS | SMS |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 1500 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 1450 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Charcoal |
| Price | - | About 50 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.32 W/kg (body) | - |
Celkon C67+
- Potentially lower price point
- May offer dual SIM functionality
- Local brand support (depending on region)
- Unknown brand reliability
- Limited publicly available information
- Potentially lower build quality
Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition
- Trusted brand reputation (Nokia)
- Reliable build quality
- 4G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Slightly higher price compared to Celkon
- Basic feature set
- Limited storage capacity
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature color displays, typical of modern feature phones, but specific resolutions and panel technologies are unknown. Given Nokia’s slightly higher market positioning, the 105 4G 2nd Edition may benefit from marginally better viewing angles and color reproduction, though this is speculative. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, as display size isn’t a primary focus in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices likely include a basic rear camera, primarily for capturing simple snapshots. Image quality will be limited by the low resolution sensors and lack of image stabilization. The camera is a secondary feature, and users shouldn’t expect smartphone-level performance. The Celkon C67+ may advertise a higher megapixel count, but this doesn’t necessarily translate to better image quality.
Performance
Performance is dictated by the MediaTek chipset commonly found in these devices, and is sufficient for basic calling, texting, and FM radio functionality. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition’s inclusion of 4G connectivity, while not demanding, requires a slightly more capable processor than a 2G-only phone. RAM capacity is likely similar on both, sufficient for the limited tasks they perform. Thermal management isn’t a concern given the low power consumption.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key strength of feature phones. Both the Celkon C67+ and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition are expected to offer several days of standby time and hours of talk time on a single charge. The Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition’s optimized power management, stemming from Nokia’s software experience, may yield slightly longer battery life, especially when utilizing 4G connectivity intermittently.
Buying Guide
Buy the Celkon C67+ if you need a potentially cheaper option and are comfortable with a less established brand, potentially benefiting from local support availability. Buy the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition if you prioritize reliability, a trusted brand name, and a generally more polished user experience, even within the constraints of a feature phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition support VoLTE calling?
Yes, the Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition supports VoLTE (Voice over LTE), allowing for high-definition voice calls and a more reliable connection on 4G networks. This is crucial as 3G networks are being phased out in many regions.
❓ Is the Celkon C67+ compatible with all 4G bands in my region?
Due to the lack of detailed specifications, it's difficult to confirm the Celkon C67+'s 4G band compatibility. It's essential to check with your mobile carrier to ensure the phone supports the 4G bands used in your area before purchasing.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp or Facebook on either of these phones?
While some feature phones now support limited versions of apps like WhatsApp, the Celkon C67+ and Nokia 105 4G 2nd Edition are unlikely to offer a full, seamless experience. They may support WhatsApp Lite, but functionality will be restricted compared to a smartphone.
