The Celkon C67+ and Gionee F103 Pro represent the ultra-budget end of the smartphone spectrum. While detailed specifications for the Celkon C67+ are scarce, we can analyze the Gionee F103 Pro’s quad-core processor and assess how it stacks up against the likely hardware choices in the Celkon, considering both brands' historical positioning. This comparison aims to determine which device offers the most value for users prioritizing basic smartphone functionality.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional, no-frills smartphone, the Gionee F103 Pro likely offers a more predictable experience due to its confirmed quad-core 1.3 GHz processor. The Celkon C67+, lacking publicly available specifications, presents a higher risk of compromised performance, making the Gionee the safer bet in this price bracket.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 3, 5, 40 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Yes | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2013, August. Released 2013, August | 2016, September. Released 2016, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 145.3 x 70.5 x 8.5 mm (5.72 x 2.78 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by) | Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | - | 143 g (5.04 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Dragontrail Glass |
| Resolution | 240 x 320 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~167 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 2.4 inches, 17.8 cm2 | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Quad-core 1.3 GHz |
| OS | - | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), Amigo 3.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 20 entries | - |
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | - | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 300 contacts | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | VGA | 13 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 4.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | Proprietary | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | No | - |
| Messaging | SMS | - |
| Sensors | - | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | - | Up to 387 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 13 h 20 min (3G) |
| Type | Li-Ion 1500 mAh, removable | Li-Po 2400 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Gold, White, Gray |
| Models | - | F103 Pro |
| SAR | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.32 W/kg (body) | - |
Celkon C67+
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- May offer a slightly different software experience
- Could include unique bundled accessories
- Lack of publicly available specifications creates uncertainty
- Potential for lower performance compared to Gionee
- Unknown camera quality
Gionee F103 Pro
- Confirmed quad-core 1.3 GHz processor provides predictable performance
- Likely more readily available and supported
- Established brand reputation (compared to Celkon)
- Entry-level processor may struggle with demanding tasks
- Limited RAM capacity could impact multitasking
- Basic camera performance
Display Comparison
Without specific display details for the Celkon C67+, it's difficult to make a direct comparison. The Gionee F103 Pro likely features a standard LCD panel common in this price range. Expect both devices to have resolutions around 480x854 or similar, prioritizing battery life over visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will likely be uncalibrated. The absence of information regarding the Celkon’s panel technology makes it impossible to assess potential advantages in viewing angles or brightness.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. The Gionee F103 Pro likely features a 5MP or 8MP main camera, while the Celkon C67+’s camera resolution is unknown. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions but will suffer significantly in low light. Expect limited dynamic range and detail. Any secondary cameras on either device (often 2MP macro lenses) are unlikely to provide significant value. Image processing will be basic, focusing on noise reduction rather than advanced features.
Performance
The Gionee F103 Pro’s quad-core 1.3 GHz processor is the defining performance factor. This chipset, while not powerful, is sufficient for basic Android operations. The Celkon C67+, lacking processor details, could potentially utilize a similar chipset or a less capable one. RAM capacity is a critical unknown for the Celkon; the Gionee likely features 1GB or 2GB, which is standard for this segment. The Gionee’s processor architecture (likely ARM Cortex-A53) will dictate its efficiency, while the Celkon’s performance will depend entirely on its undisclosed components. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern on either device due to the low-power processors.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is a crucial factor in this segment. While the exact capacity of both devices is unknown, they likely fall in the 2000mAh to 3000mAh range. The Gionee F103 Pro’s 1.3 GHz quad-core processor should offer reasonable battery life for basic usage. Charging times will be slow, likely taking several hours to fully charge via micro-USB. Without knowing the Celkon C67+'s battery capacity, it's impossible to accurately compare endurance, but a larger capacity would be a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Celkon C67+ if you need a secondary device for extremely basic tasks like calls and texts, and are willing to accept potential performance limitations due to the lack of detailed specifications. Buy the Gionee F103 Pro if you prefer a more reliable experience with a known processor, even if it's entry-level, and anticipate using the phone for light social media browsing and messaging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Gionee F103 Pro capable of running popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Gionee F103 Pro’s quad-core 1.3 GHz processor and likely 1GB or 2GB of RAM should be sufficient to run Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag, although multitasking with other apps simultaneously may cause slowdowns. Optimizing app usage and clearing cache regularly will help maintain performance.
❓ What type of SIM card does the Gionee F103 Pro support, and does it support 4G connectivity?
The Gionee F103 Pro typically supports dual SIM cards (Micro-SIM, Micro-SIM). It is likely to support 4G LTE connectivity, allowing for faster data speeds where available, but this depends on the specific regional variant. Check the product specifications for your region to confirm 4G support.
❓ Given the lack of information on the Celkon C67+, is it worth the risk to purchase it over the Gionee F103 Pro?
Generally, no. The Gionee F103 Pro offers a more predictable experience due to its known specifications. The Celkon C67+’s lack of transparency introduces a significant risk of receiving a device with subpar performance or features. Unless the Celkon is significantly cheaper, the Gionee is the safer choice.
